Improving the Identification Coverage of Protein Interactome by Enhancing the Click Chemistry-based Cross-linking Enrichment Efficiency
Zhao, L.; Zhao, Q.; An, Y.; Gao, H.; Zhang, X.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.
Show abstract
Chemical cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry has emerged as a powerful strategy which enables global profiling of protein interactome with direct interaction interfaces in complex biological systems. The alkyne-tagged enrichable cross-linkers are preferred to improve the coverage of low-abundance cross-linked peptides, combined with click chemistry for biotin conjugation to allow the cross-linked peptides enrichment. However, a systematic evaluation on the efficiency of click approaches (protein-based or peptide-based) and diverse cleavable click chemistry ligands (acid, reduction, photo) for cross-linked peptides enrichment and release is lacking. Herein, together with in vivo chemical cross-linking by alkyne-tagged cross-linker, we explored the click chemistry-based enrichment approaches on protein and peptide level with three cleavable click chemistry ligands, respectively. By comparison, the approach of protein-based click chemistry conjugation with acid-cleavable tag was demonstrated to permit the most cross-linked peptides identification. The advancement of this strategy enhanced the proteome-wide cross-linking analysis, permitting a detection of 5,017 protein-protein interactions among 1,909 proteins across all subcellular compartments with wide abundance distribution in cell. Therefore, all these results demonstrated a guideline value of our work for efficient cross-linked peptides enrichment, thus facilitated the in-depth profiling of protein interactome for functional analysis. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=67 SRC="FIGDIR/small/475819v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (17K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a7ae4forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a4d6d2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@113a0eborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a9c193_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Contaminant Spot Check and Removal Assay (ContamSPOT) for Mass Spectrometry Analysis 96%
- Identifying Sialylation Linkages at the Glycopeptide Level by Glycosyltransferase Labeling Assisted Mass Spectrometry (GLAMS) 95%
- Evaluation and Optimization of High-Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry for Multiplexed Quantitative Site-specific N-glycoproteomics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Segmented MS/MS acquisition of a1 ion-based strategy for in-depth proteome quantitation 97%
- SPPUSM: An MS/MS spectra merging strategy for improved low-input and single-cell proteome identification 96%
- High Spatial Resolution Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging Using Microscopy Image Fusion Determines Tumor Margins 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- pH-Controlled chemoselective rapid azo-coupling reaction (CRACR) enables global profiling of serotonylation proteome in cancer cells 96%
- An integrated strategy reveals complex glycosylation of erythropoietin using top-down and bottom-up mass spectrometry 96%
- Optimized Time-segmented Acquisition Expands Peptide and Protein Identification in TIMS-TOF Pro Mass Spectrometry 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Photoredox-catalyzed decarboxylative C-terminal differentiation for bulk and single molecule proteomics 96%
- Mass spectrometric method for the unambiguous profiling of cellular dynamic glycosylation. 96%
- Dual-Probe Activity-Based Protein Profiling Reveals Site-Specific Differences in Protein Binding of EGFR-Directed Drugs 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chemical Proteomics Reveals Protein Tyrosination Extends Beyond the Alpha-Tubulins in Human Cells. 96%
- Site-specific phosphorylation of Huntingtin exon 1 recombinant proteins enabled by the discovery of novel kinases 93%
- Laccase-mediated catalyzed fluorescent reporter deposition for live cell imaging 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.