Back

Overdiagnosis and treatment of COPD in nonagenarians

Tole, M.; Ascoli, C.; Joo, M.; Rubinstein, I.

2022-01-21 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2022.01.21.22269644 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe prevalence of COPD is increasing with age. However, the effects of age-dependent decline in lung function on diagnosis and treatment of COPD in nonagenarians are uncertain. ObjectivesTo determine performance of spirometry, prescription of COPD medications, and COPD-related acute care visits and hospitalizations in patients 90 years and older with physician-diagnosed COPD. MethodsHealth records of 166 consecutive patients 90 years and older with physician-diagnosed COPD at a university-affiliated medical center in Chicago were reviewed. Pertinent demographic, clinical, and physiological data were extracted. ResultsPatients were predominantly ex-smoker (96%), African American (52%) males (96%). Sixty patients (36%) had no spirometry testing on record. Of the remaining 106 patients, 11 (10%) had baseline FEV1/FVC[&ge;]0.70, 24 (23%) had post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC [&ge;]0.70, 28 (26%) had FEV1/FVC <0.70 and [&ge;]LLN, and 43 (41%) had FEV1/FVC <0.70 and <LLN. Thus, only 71 of 166 patients 90 years and older (43%) fulfilled the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommendations. Nonetheless, COPD medications, predominantly short-acting {beta}2 agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists, were prescribed to 95 of the 166 patients (57%). No significant differences in prevalence of co-morbidities and prescribed COPD medications, including systemic corticosteroids and anti-infectives prescribed during unscheduled healthcare visits and hospitalizations, were found between the four groups. ConclusionsThese data suggest that a large proportion of nonagenarians at our medical center are overdiagnosed with and treated for COPD. A larger, multi-center, prospective study is warranted to support or refute these retrospective observations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.6%
2
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
5
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
8
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
10
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
12
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
14
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
20
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
25
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%