Back

Proteomic deconvolution reveals distinct immune cell fractions in different body sites in SARS-Cov-2 positive individuals

Okendo, J.; Okanda, D.

2022-01-23 health informatics
10.1101/2022.01.21.22269631 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to be a significant public health challenge globally. SARS-CoV-2 is a novel virus, and what constitutes immunological responses in different human body sites in infected individuals is yet to be presented. We set to determine the various immune cell fractions in gargle solution, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, nasopharyngeal, and urine samples post-SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. Materials and methodsWe downloaded proteomics data from (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/) with the following identifiers: PXD019423, n=3 (gargle solution), PXD018970, n=15 (urine), PXD022085, n=5 (Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid), PXD022889, n=18 (nasopharyngeal). MaxQuant was used for the peptide spectral matching using humans, and SARS-CoV-2 was downloaded from the UniProt database (Access date 9th January 2022). The protein count matrix was extracted from the proteins group file and used as an input for the cibersort for the immune cells fraction determination. ResultsThe body of individuals infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus is characterized by different fractions of immune cells in Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), nasopharyngeal, urine, and gargle solution. BALF has more abundant memory B cells, CD8, activated mast cells, and resting macrophages than urine, nasopharyngeal, and gargle solution. Our analysis also demonstrates that each body site comprises different immune cell fractions post-SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. ConclusionDifferent body sites are characterized by different immune cells fractions in SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals. The findings in this study can inform public health policies and health professionals on treatment strategies and drive SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis procedures.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
15.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.7%
3
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
5
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
7
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
8
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
10
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
20
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
24
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
26
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%