Back

Proteomic deconvolution reveals distinct immune cell fractions in different body sites in SARS-Cov-2 positive individuals

Okendo, J.; Okanda, D.

2022-01-23 health informatics
10.1101/2022.01.21.22269631 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to be a significant public health challenge globally. SARS-CoV-2 is a novel virus, and what constitutes immunological responses in different human body sites in infected individuals is yet to be presented. We set to determine the various immune cell fractions in gargle solution, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, nasopharyngeal, and urine samples post-SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. Materials and methodsWe downloaded proteomics data from (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/) with the following identifiers: PXD019423, n=3 (gargle solution), PXD018970, n=15 (urine), PXD022085, n=5 (Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid), PXD022889, n=18 (nasopharyngeal). MaxQuant was used for the peptide spectral matching using humans, and SARS-CoV-2 was downloaded from the UniProt database (Access date 9th January 2022). The protein count matrix was extracted from the proteins group file and used as an input for the cibersort for the immune cells fraction determination. ResultsThe body of individuals infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus is characterized by different fractions of immune cells in Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), nasopharyngeal, urine, and gargle solution. BALF has more abundant memory B cells, CD8, activated mast cells, and resting macrophages than urine, nasopharyngeal, and gargle solution. Our analysis also demonstrates that each body site comprises different immune cell fractions post-SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. ConclusionDifferent body sites are characterized by different immune cells fractions in SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals. The findings in this study can inform public health policies and health professionals on treatment strategies and drive SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis procedures.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.