Back

Corneal cisterns as drainage aqueducts

GUPTA, S.; JOSHI, S.; Mahalingam, K.; SINGH, A.; ARORA, M.; GUPTA, V.

2022-01-21 ophthalmology
10.1101/2022.01.20.22268650 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceAnterior chamber paracentesis (ACP) is a known method of rapid reduction of IOP. The mechanism of how corneal fluid clears after ACP is not well described. ObjectiveTo determine the mechanism of instantaneous corneal clearing of edema after ACP. Design, setting, and participantsThis case series includes consecutive patients with high IOP and associated corneal edema, who presented to the Glaucoma Services of our tertiary care center. Pre- and post-intervention (ACP) ASOCTs were analyzed. Main outcome measuresResolution of corneal edema (clinical picture) and imaging of peripheral cornea and iridocorneal angle area. ResultsTen consecutive patients who underwent an ACP were included in this study. The mean IOP pre-intervention was 48.4 {+/-} 8.2 mmHg. ASOCT showed ill-defined conventional pathways of aqueous outflow, which were blocked by peripheral anterior synechiae in 4 eyes. Immediately post ACP, the IOP was 16.3 {+/-} 5.6 mmHg (p < 0.001) and corneal edema resolved immediately. We found on ASOCT, that the intrastromal hypolucency of the peripheral cornea, (corneal cistern) which was limited in extent and U shaped, showed a posterior extension into the corneo-limbal junction to form well-defined anastomoses with the conventional aqueous drainage channels demonstrating a direct conduit for intracorneal fluid to egress. In 2/10 eyes, Schlemms canal opened intracamerally as well, suggesting direct reflux of intra-corneal fluid into the anterior chamber. Conclusion and RelevanceAfter an ACP, in eyes with corneal edema to relieve IOP, we observed that the intracorneal cisterns undergo peripheral extension to drain corneal fluid through the conventional distal outflow channels.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.