"It affects every aspect of your life": A qualitative study of the impact of delaying surgery during COVID-19
Sauro, K. M.; Smith, C.; Kersen, J.; Schalm, E.; Jaworska, N.; Roach, P.; Beesoon, S.; Brindle, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has overwhelmed healthcare systems, leading many jurisdictions to reduce surgical services to create capacity (beds and staff) to care for the surge of patients with COVID-19. These decisions were made in haste, and little is known about the impact on patients whose surgery was delayed. This study explores the impact of delaying non-urgent surgeries on patients, from their perspective. MethodsUsing an interpretative description approach, we conducted interviews with adult patients and their caregivers who had their surgery delayed or cancelled during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alberta, Canada. Trained interviewers conducted semi-structured interviews. Interviews were iteratively analyzed by two independent reviewers using an inductive approach to thematic content analysis to understand key elements of the patient experience. ResultsWe conducted 16 interviews with participants ranging from 27 to 75 years of age with a variety of surgical procedures delayed. We identified four interconnected themes: individual-level impacts (physical health, mental health, family and friends, work, quality of life), system-level factors (healthcare resources, communication, perceived accountability/responsibility), unique issues related to COVID-19, and uncertainty. InterpretationThe patient-reported impact of having a surgery delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic was diffuse and consequential. While the decision to delay non-urgent surgeries was made to manage the strain on healthcare systems, our study illustrates the consequences of these decisions. We advocate for the development and adoption of strategies to mitigate the burden of distress that waiting for surgery during and after COVID-19 has on patients and their family/caregivers.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- What matters to patients?: a timely question for Value Based Care 94%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 94%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 95%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 94%
- The patient experience of COVID-19: A qualitative investigation with symptomatic outpatients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 93%
- Impact of the Federated Data Platform's digital surgery scheduling system on elective theatre utilisation at an NHS Trust: an interrupted time series analysis 92%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 95%
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 94%
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 94%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 94%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.