Seeing sounds: Neural mechanisms underlying auditory contributions to visual detection
Perez-Bellido, A.; Spaak, E.; de Lange, F. P.
Show abstract
Sounds enhance the detection of visual stimuli while concurrently biasing an observers decisions. To investigate the neural mechanisms that underlie such multisensory interactions, we decoded time-resolved signal detection theory (SDT) sensitivity and criterion parameters from neural activity using magnetoencalography, while participants performed a visual detection task. Using temporal generalization analysis, we found that sounds improve visual detection by enhancing the maintenance of the most informative perceptual samples over time. In parallel, criterion decoding analyses revealed that sounds evoke patterns of activity that resembled the patterns evoked by an actual visual stimulus. These two complementary mechanisms of audiovisual interaction differed in terms of their automaticity: Whereas the sound-induced enhancement in visual information maintenance depended on participants being actively engaged in a detection task, sounds evoked visual activity patterns in the visual cortex in a bottom-up fashion, challenging the classical assumption that sound- induced reductions in criterion correspond to decision-level biases.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Discovery, Interruption, and Updating of Auditory Regularities in Memory: Evidence from Low-Frequency Brain Dynamics in Human MEG 97%
- Covert attention increases the gain of stimulus-evoked population codes 97%
- Neurophysiology of effortful listening: Decoupling motivational modulation from task demands 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frequency-specific neural signatures of perceptual content and perceptual stability 97%
- Neural signatures of vigilance decrements predict behavioural errors before they occur 97%
- Local cortical desynchronization and pupil-linked arousal differentially shape brain states for optimal sensory performance 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.