Bayesian stroke modeling details sex biases in the white matter substrates of aphasia
Kernbach, J. M.; Hartwigsen, G.; Lim, J.-S.; Bae, H.-J.; Yu, K.-H.; Schlaug, G.; Bonkhoff, A. K.; Rost, N. S.; Bzdok, D.
Show abstract
Ischemic cerebrovascular events often lead to aphasia. Previous work provided hints that such strokes may affect women and men in distinct ways. Women tend to suffer strokes with more disabling language impairment, even if the lesion size is comparable to men. In 1,401 patients, we isolated data-led representations of anatomical lesion patterns and hand-tailored a Bayesian analytical solution to carefully model the degree of sex divergence in predicting language outcomes [~]3 months after stroke. We located lesion-outcome effects in the left-dominant language network that highlight the ventral pathway as a core lesion focus across different tests of language performance. We provide newly detailed evidence for sex-specific brain-behavior associations in the domain-general networks associated with cortico-subcortical pathways, with unique contributions of the fornix in women and cingular fiber bundles in men. Our collective findings suggest diverging white matter substrates in how stroke causes language deficits in women and men. Clinically acknowledging such sex disparities has the potential to improve personalized treatment for stroke patients worldwide.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Midbrain-Hippocampus Structural Connectivity Selectively Predicts Motivated Memory Encoding 94%
- Callosal fiber length scales with brain size according to functional lateralization, evolution, and development 93%
- Direct structural connections between auditory and visual motion selective regions in humans 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.