Who was wearing a mask in 2021? Update on gender-, age-, and location-related differences during the COVID-19 pandemic
Haischer, M. H.; Beilfuss, R. N.; Hart, M. R.; Opielinski, L.; Schmit, E.; Wrucke, D.; Zhao, H.; Uhrich, T. D.; Hunter, S. K.
Show abstract
Previous observational work from 2020 demonstrated gender-, age-, and location-related differences in mask-wearing behavior, despite the efficacy and public health messaging that emphasized face coverings in combatting the spread of COVID-19. In 2021, COVID-19 vaccinations and a corresponding change in public health policy became new considerations in deciding personal protective behaviors. To provide an update on mask wearers and resistors approximately one year after our initial study, we observed shoppers (n = 6,118) entering retail stores using the same experimental methodology. Approximately 26% of individuals wore a mask. Mask wearing has decreased across demographic groups compared to 2020. Aligning with previous findings, females were [~]1.5x more likely to be observed wearing a mask than males, and the odds of observing a shopper wearing a mask in a suburban or urban area was far greater than at rural stores ([~]5.7x and [~]3.3x, respectively). Gender and location are confirmed to be significant and stable factors that impact mask-wearing behavior in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of age on mask wearing was heavily reduced compared to 2020, potentially due to the availability of COVID-19 vaccines and change in mask guidance for vaccinated individuals.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Professional practice for COVID-19 risk reduction among health care workers: a Cross-Sectional Study with Matched Case-Control Comparison 93%
- The new silicone N99 half-piece respirator, VJR-NMU N99: A novel and effective tool to prevent COVID-19 93%
- Compliance with Covid-19 measures: evidence from New Zealand 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 92%
- Air pollution exposure, respiratory consequences, and perceptions among urban African children living in poor conditions – a case study in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire 91%
- Prevalence and determinants of evidence of silicosis and impaired lung function, among small scale tanzanite miners and the peri-mining community in northern Tanzania 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors for the Mitigation and Containment of a COVID-19 Outbreak in a Meat Processing Plant 91%
- Spread of infection and treatment interruption among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study 91%
- Agility and sustainability: A qualitative evaluation of COVID-19 Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) in the UK logistics sector 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 testing preferences in a national cohort in the United States 89%
- Implications of COVID-19 vaccination and public health countermeasures on SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in Canada: evidence from a spatial hierarchical cluster analysis 89%
- Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Knowledge and Perceptions: A Survey of Healthcare Workers 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Due to Wild-Type SARS-CoV-2 More Prevalent in Adolescents and Youth than in Older Adults Based on 19 US States in Fall 2020 Prior to Vaccine Availability 92%
- Elastomeric Harnesses Decrease Aerosol Particles Leak and Improve the Fit of Surgical Masks 92%
- Low prevalence of COVID-19 Exposure is Coincident with Self-reported Compliance with Public Health Guidelines among Essential Employees at an Institute of Higher Education 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.