Back

Arresting microbiome development limits immune system maturation and resistance to infection.

Lubin, J.-B.; Green, J.; Maddux, S.; Denu, L.; Duranova, T.; Lanza, M.; Wynosky-Dolfi, M.; Brodsky, I. E.; Planet, P. J.; Silverman, M. A.

2022-01-18 immunology
10.1101/2022.01.17.476513 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Disruptions to the intestinal microbiome during weaning lead to long-term negative effects on host immune function. However, the critical host-microbe interactions occurring during weaning required for healthy immune system development remain poorly understood. We find that restricting microbiome maturation during weaning leads to stunted immune system development and increased susceptibility to enteric infection. We developed a gnotobiotic mouse model of the early-life microbiome designated as Pediatric Community (PedsCom). This nine-member consortium of microbes derived from intestinal microbiomes of preweaning mice stably colonized germfree adult mice and was efficiently transmitted to offspring for multiple generations. Unexpectedly, the relative abundance of PedsCom microbes were largely unaffected by the transition from a milk-based to a fiber rich solid food diet. PedsCom mice developed less peripheral regulatory T cells and Immunoglobulin A, hallmarks of microbiota-driven immune system development. Consistent with defects in maturation, adult PedsCom mice retain high susceptibility to salmonella infection characteristic of young mice and humans. Altogether, our work illustrates how the post-weaning transition in intestinal microbiome composition contributes to normal immune maturation and protection from enteric infection. Accurate modelling of the pre-weaning microbiome provides a window into the microbial requirements of healthy immune development and suggests an opportunity to design microbial interventions at weaning to improve immune system development in human infants. One Sentence SummaryArresting microbiome development stunts immune ontogeny

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.