Estimation of the COVID-19 Average Incubation Time:Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and SensitivityAnalyses
Weng, Y.; Yi, G. Y.
Show abstract
ObjectivesWe aim to provide sensible estimates of the average incubation time of COVID-19 by capitalizing available estimates reported in the literature and explore different ways to accommodate heterogeneity involved with the reported studies. MethodsWe search through online databases to collect the studies about estimates of the average incubation time and conduct meta-analyses to accommodate heterogeneity of the studies and the publication bias. Cochrans heterogeneity statistic Q and Higgins & Thompsons I2 statistic are employed. Subgroup analyses are conducted using mixed effects models and publication bias is assessed using the funnel plot and Eggers test. ResultsUsing all those reported mean incubation estimates, the average incubation time is estimated to be 6.43 days with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (5.90, 6.96), and using all those reported mean incubation estimates together with those transformed median incubation estimates, the estimated average incubation time is 6.07 days with a 95% CI (5.70,6.45). ConclusionsProviding sensible estimates of the average incubation time for COVID-19 is important yet complex, and the available results vary considerably due to many factors including heterogeneity and publication bias. We take different angles to estimate the mean incubation time, and our analyses provide estimates to range from 5.68 days to 8.30 days.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Synthesizing evidence from the earliest studies to support decision-making: to what extent could the evidence be reliable? 95%
- Evaluation of statistical methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: a simulation study 94%
- Development of a search filter to retrieve reports of interrupted time series studies from MEDLINE and PubMed 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 95%
- A method of back-calculating the log odds ratio and standard error of the log odds ratio from the reported group-level risk of disease 93%
- Data-driven Prior Elicitation for Bayes Factors in Cox Regression for Nine Subfields in Biomedicine 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does advance contact with research participants increase response to questionnaires: A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis 93%
- Quantitative bias analysis for mismeasured variables in health research: a review of software tools 92%
- Investigator-initiated versus industry-sponsored trials – Visibility and relevance of randomized controlled trials in clinical practice guidelines (IMPACT) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of retracted randomised controlled trials on systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study 93%
- Characteristics and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of prevalence studies in adult populations: a meta-epidemiological study 92%
- Quantitative bias analysis methods for summary level epidemiologic data in the peer-reviewed literature: a systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multicenter preclinical studies as an innovative method to enhance translation: a systematic review of published studies 89%
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 89%
- The effect of variation of individual infectiousness on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in households 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.