Pain-related learning signals in the human insula
Horing, B.; Büchel, C.
Show abstract
Pain is not only a perceptual phenomenon, but also a preeminent learning signal. In reinforcement learning models, prediction errors (PEs) play a crucial role, i.e. the mismatch between expectation and sensory input. In particular, advanced learning models require the representation of different types of PEs, namely signed PEs (whether more or less pain was expected) to specify the direction of learning, and unsigned PEs (the absolute deviation from an expectation) to adapt the learning rate. The insula has been shown to play an important role in pain intensity coding and in signaling surprise. However, mainly unsigned PEs could be identified in the anterior insula. It remains an open question whether these PEs are specific to pain, and whether signed PEs are also represented in the insula. To answer these questions, 47 subjects learned associations of two conditioned stimuli (CS) with four unconditioned stimuli (US; painful heat or loud sound, of one low and one high intensity each) while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and skin conductance response (SCR) measurements. CS-US associations reversed multiple times between intensities and between sensory modalities, generating frequent PEs. SCRs indicated comparable nonspecific characteristics of the two modalities. fMRI analyses focusing on the insular and opercular cortices contralateral to painful stimulation showed that activation in the anterior insula correlated with unsigned intensity PEs. Importantly, this unsigned PE signal was similar for pain and aversive sounds and also modality PEs, indicating an unspecific aversive surprise signal. Conversely, signed pain intensity PE signals were modality-specific and located in the dorsal posterior insula, an area previously implicated in pain intensity processing. Previous studies have identified abnormal insula function and abnormal learning as potential causes of pain chronification. Our findings link these results and suggest one potential mechanism, namely a misrepresentation of learning relevant prediction errors in the insular cortex.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The neural dynamics of positive and negative expectations of pain 97%
- Cortico-spinal coupling along descending pain system differentiates between opioid and saline treatment in healthy participants 96%
- Instructions and experiential learning have similar impacts on pain and pain-related brain responses but produce dissociations in value-based reversal learning 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Another's pain in my brain: No evidence that placebo analgesia affects the sensory-discriminative component in empathy for pain 96%
- Effect sizes and test-retest reliability of the fMRI-based Neurologic Pain Signature 96%
- A machine learning based approach towards high-dimensional mediation analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction and action in cortical pain processing 96%
- Beyond sharing unpleasant affect - evidence for pain-specific opioidergic modulation of empathy for pain 94%
- Acute pain drives different effects on local and global cortical excitability in motor and prefrontal areas: Insights into interregional and interpersonal differences in pain processing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Baseline Resting-State Functional Connectivity Determines Subsequent Pain Ratings to a Tonic Ecologically Valid Experimental Model of Orofacial Pain 96%
- Assessing the predictive value of peak alpha frequency for the sensitivity to pain 96%
- Subjective salience ratings are a reliable proxy for physiological measures of arousal 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural mechanisms of costly helping in the general population and mirror-pain synesthetes 94%
- Alpha-to-beta- and gamma-band activity reflect predictive coding in affective visual processing 93%
- Noninvasive stimulation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex modulates rationality of human decision-making 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.