Back

Task-specific neural processes underlying conflict resolution during cognitive control

Xiao, Y.; Chou, C.-C.; Cosgrove, G. R.; Crone, N. E.; Stone, S.; Madsen, J. R.; Reucroft, I.; Weisholtz, D.; Shih, Y.-C.; Yu, H.-Y.; Anderson, W. S.; Kreiman, G.

2022-01-18 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.01.16.476535 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cognitive control involves flexibly combining multiple sensory inputs with task-dependent goals during decision making. Several tasks have been proposed to examine cognitive control, including Stroop, Eriksen-Flanker, and the Multi-source interference task. Because these tasks have been studied independently, it remains unclear whether the neural signatures of cognitive control reflect abstract control mechanisms or specific combinations of sensory and behavioral aspects of each task. To address this question, here we recorded invasive neurophysiological signals from 16 subjects and directly compared the three tasks against each other. Neural activity patterns in the theta and high-gamma frequency bands differed between incongruent and congruent conditions, revealing strong modulation by conflicting task demands. These neural signals were specific to each task, generalizing within a task but not across tasks. These results highlight the complex interplay between sensory inputs, motor outputs, and task demands and argue against a universal and abstract representation of conflict.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.