Distinct Vaccine Efficacy Rates Among Health Care Workers During a COVID-19 Outbreak in Jordan
Sultan, I.; Tbakhi, A.; Abuatta, O.; Mubarak, S.; Alsmadi, O.; Edilbi, A.; Al-Ani, R.; Makhlouf, M.; Hajir, R.; Khresat, O.; Al Ruzeieh, M. A.; Abdelrazeq, H.; Mansour, A.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDWe aimed to assess the efficacy of 3 COVID-19 vaccines in a population of health care workers at a tertiary cancer center in Amman, Jordan. METHODSWe evaluated the records of 2855 employees who were fully vaccinated with 1 of 3 different vaccines and those of 140 employees who were not vaccinated. We measured the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections that occurred at least 14 days after the second vaccine dose. RESULTSThe 100-day cumulative incidence of PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections was 19.3% {+/-} 3.3% for unvaccinated employees and 1.7% {+/-} 0.27% for fully vaccinated employees. The 100-day cumulative infection rates were 0.7% {+/-} 0.22% in BNT162b2 vaccine recipients (n = 1714), 3.6% {+/-} 0.77% in BBIBP-CorV recipients (n = 680), and 2.3% {+/-} 0.73% in ChAdOx1 recipients (n = 456). We used Cox regression analyses to compare the risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection among the different vaccine recipient groups and found a significantly higher infection risk in BBIBP-CorV (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.9 {+/-} 0.31) and ChAdOx1 recipients (HR = 3.0 {+/-} 0.41) compared to BNT162b2 recipients (P = .00039 and .0074, respectively). Vaccinated employees who had no previously confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections were at a markedly higher risk for breakthrough infections than those who experienced prior infections (HR = 5.7 {+/-} 0.73, P = .0178). CONCLUSIONSOur study offers a real-world example of differential vaccine efficacy among a high-risk population during a national outbreak. We also show the important synergism between a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. FundingNone
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine 95%
- Impact of previous COVID-19 on immune response after a single dose of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine 94%
- Correlation of post-vaccination fever with specific antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 booster and no significant influence of antipyretic medication 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Persistent health issues, adverse events of significant concern, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination- findings from a real-world cohort study of healthcare workers in north India 96%
- COMPARATIVE IMMUNOGENICITY OF BNT162b2 mRNA VACCINE WITH NATURAL COVID-19 INFECTION 95%
- Analysis of immunization, adverse events, and efficacy of a fourth dose of BNT162b2 vaccine 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Necessity of COVID-19 vaccination in previously infected individuals 95%
- Immunogenicity of a third dose of BNT162b2 to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 & Omicron variant in adults who received two doses of inactivated vaccine 95%
- Single-dose mRNA vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers extending 16 weeks post-vaccination: a test-negative design from Quebec, Canada 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity against the SARS-CoV-2 variants following heterologous primary series involving CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 plus heterologous BNT162b2 booster vaccination: An open-label randomized study in healthy Thai adults 94%
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster with an RBD virus-like particle vaccine following two- or three-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccine 94%
- Immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccine in lung cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment: A prospective multicenter cohort study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.