Transcranial alternating current stimulation does not modulate corticospinal activity in humans
Ibanez, J.; Zicher, B.; Brown, K.; Rocchi, L.; Casolo, A.; Del Vecchio, A.; Spampinato, D.; Vollete, C.-A.; Rothwell, J. C.; Baker, S. N.; Farina, D.
Show abstract
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (TACS) is commonly used to synchronise the output of a cortical area to other parts of the nervous system, but evidence for this based on brain recordings in humans is challenging. The brain transmits beta oscillations (~21Hz) to tonically contracted limb muscles linearly and through the fastest corticospinal pathways. Therefore, muscle activity may be used as a proxy measure for the level of beta entrainment in the corticospinal tract due to TACS over motor cortex. Here, we assessed if TACS is able to modulate the neural inputs to muscles, which would provide an indirect evidence for TACS-driven neural entrainment. In the first part of this study, we ran a series of simulations of motor neuron (MN) pools receiving inputs from corticospinal neurons with different levels of beta entrainment. Results indicated that MNs should be highly sensitive to changes in corticospinal beta activity. Then, we ran experiments on healthy human subjects (N=10) in which TACS (at 1mA) was delivered over the motor cortex at 21Hz (beta stimulation), or at 7Hz or 40Hz (control conditions) while the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) or the tibialis anterior muscle (TA) were tonically contracted. Muscle activity was measured using high-density electromyography, which allowed us to decompose the spiking activity of pools of motor units innervating the studied muscles. By analysing motor unit pool activity, we observed that none of the tested TACS conditions could consistently alter the spectral characteristics of the common neural inputs received by the muscles. These results suggest that 1mA-TACS over motor cortex given at frequencies in the beta band does not affect corticospinal beta entrainment. Highlights- TACS is commonly used to entrain the communication between brain regions - It is challenging to find direct evidence supporting TACS-driven neural entrainment - Simulations show that motor neurons are sensitive to corticospinal beta entrainment - Motor unit activity from human muscles does not support TACS-driven entrainment
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Personalized stimulation therapies for disorders of consciousness: A computational approach to inducing healthy-like brain activity based on neural field theory 95%
- Adaptive HD-sEMG decomposition: Towards robust real-time decoding of neural drive 95%
- Toward a generalizable deep CNN for neural drive estimation across muscles and participants 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circuits and mechanisms for TMS-induced corticospinal waves: Connecting sensitivityanalysis to the network graph 96%
- The visual cortex produces gamma band echo in response to broadband visual flicker 95%
- Selection of stimulus parameters for enhancing slow wave sleep events with a Neural-field theory thalamocortical computational model 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does pericentral mu-rhythm power corticomotor excitability? A matter of EEG perspective 96%
- Simulation of evoked responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation using a multiscale cortical circuit model 95%
- Working memory enhancement using real-time phase-tuned transcranial alternating current stimulation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Steady state evoked potential (SSEP) responses in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices of anesthetized cats: nonlinearity characterized by harmonic and intermodulation frequencies 95%
- Unraveling intra- and intersegmental neuronal connectivity between central pattern generating networks in a multi-legged locomotor system 94%
- Optimal sigmoid function models for analysis of transspinal evoked potential recruitment curves recorded from different muscles 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.