Back

Addressing selection bias in the UK Biobank neurological imaging cohort

Bradley, V. C.; Nichols, T. E.

2022-01-14 public and global health
10.1101/2022.01.13.22269266 medRxiv
Show abstract

The UK Biobank is a national prospective study of half a million participants between the ages of 40 and 69 at the time of recruitment between 2006 and 2010, established to facilitate research on diseases of aging. The imaging cohort is a subset of UK Biobank participants who have agreed to undergo extensive additional imaging assessments. However, Fry et al. (2017) finds evidence of "healthy volunteer bias" in the UK Biobank - participants are less likely to smoke, be obese, consume alcohol daily than the target population of UK adults. Here we examine selection bias in the UK Biobank imaging cohort. We address two common misconceptions: first, that study size can compensate for bias in data collection, and second that selection bias does not affect estimates of associations, which are the primary interest of the UK Biobank. We introduce inverse probability weighting (IPW) as an approach commonly used in survey research that can be used to address selection bias in volunteer health studies like the UK Biobank. We discuss 6 such methods - five existing and one novel -, assess relative performance in simulation studies, and apply them to the UK Biobank imaging cohort. We find that our novel method, BART for predicting the probability of selection combined with raking, performs well relative to existing methods, and helps alleviate selection bias in the UK Biobank imaging cohort.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biostatistics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
4
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
6
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
9
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
14
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
18
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Research Synthesis Methods
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%