Back

Individual variation in dispersal, and its sources, shape the fate of pushed vs. pulled range expansions

Dahirel, M.; Guicharnaud, C.; Vercken, E.

2022-01-13 ecology
10.1101/2022.01.12.476009 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ecological and evolutionary dynamics of range expansions are shaped by both dispersal and population growth. Accordingly, density-dependence in either dispersal or growth can determine whether expansions are pulled or pushed, i.e. whether expansion velocities and genetic diversity are mainly driven by recent, low-density edge populations, or by older populations closer to the core. Despite this and despite abundant evidence of dispersal evolution during expansions, the impact of density-dependent dispersal and its evolution on expansion dynamics remains understudied. Here, we used simulation models to examine the influence of individual trait variation in both dispersal capacity and dispersal density- dependence on expansions, and how it impacts the position of expansions on the pulled-pushed continuum. First, we found that knowing about the evolution of density-dependent dispersal at the range edge can greatly improve our ability to predict whether an expansion is (more) pushed or (more) pulled. Second, we found that both dispersal costs and the sources of variation in dispersal (genetic or non-genetic, in dispersal capacity versus in density- dependence) greatly influence how expansion dynamics evolve. Among other scenarios, pushed expansions tended to become more pulled with time only when density-dependence was highly heritable, dispersal costs were low and dispersal capacity could not evolve. When, on the other hand, variation in density-dependence had no genetic basis, but dispersal capacity could evolve, then pushed expansions tended to become more pushed with time, and pulled expansions more pulled. More generally, our results show that trying to predict expansion velocities and dynamics using trait information from non-expanding regions only may be problematic, that both dispersal variation and its sources play a key role in determining whether an expansion is and stays pushed, and that environmental context (here dispersal costs) cannot be neglected. Those simulations suggest new avenues of research to explore, both in terms of theoretical studies and regarding ways to empirically study pushed vs. pulled range expansions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.6%
4
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
5
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.0%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
8
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
12
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
14
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
17
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Evolutionary Ecology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
22
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%