Mid-level feature differences underlie early animacy and object size distinctions: Evidence from EEG decoding
Wang, R.; Janini, D.; Konkle, T.
Show abstract
Responses to visually-presented objects along the cortical surface of the human brain have a large-scale organization reflecting the broad categorical divisions of animacy and object size. Mounting evidence indicates that this topographical organization is driven by differences between objects in mid-level perceptual features. With regard to the timing of neural responses, images of objects quickly evoke neural responses with decodable information about animacy and object size, but are mid-level features sufficient to evoke these rapid neural responses? Or is slower iterative neural processing required to untangle information about animacy and object size from mid-level features? To answer this question, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure human neural responses to images of objects and their texform counterparts - unrecognizable images which preserve some mid-level feature information about texture and coarse form. We found that texform images evoked neural responses with early decodable information about both animacy and real-world size, as early as responses evoked by original images. Further, successful cross-decoding indicates that both texform and original images evoke information about animacy and size through a common underlying neural basis. Broadly, these results indicate that the visual system contains a mid-level feature bank carrying linearly decodable information on animacy and size, which can be rapidly activated without requiring explicit recognition or protracted temporal processing.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel verbal instructions recruit abstract neural patterns of time-variable information dimensionality 97%
- Selective enhancement of object representations through multisensory integration 97%
- Disentangling the Independent Contributions of Visual and Conceptual Features to the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Scene Categorization 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing Neural Correlates of Memory Encoding and Maintenance for Foveal and Peripheral Stimuli 97%
- Differential and overlapping effects between exogenous and endogenous attention shape perceptual facilitation during visual processing 96%
- Spatial predictive context speeds up visual search by biasing local attentional competition 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Semantic scene-object consistency modulates N300/400 EEG components, but does not automatically facilitate object representations 97%
- Your place or mine? The neural dynamics of personally familiar scene recognition suggests category independent familiarity encoding 97%
- Visual periodicity reveals distinct attentional signatures for face and non-face categories 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.