Development of a screening tool for pelvic floor dysfunction in female athletes: protocol of a Delphi consensus
Giagio, S.; Turolla, A.; Innocenti, T.; Salvioli, S.; Gava, G.; Pillastrini, P.; Vecchiato, M.; Dakic, J.; Frawley, H. C.; Bo, K.
Show abstract
Background/aimSeveral epidemiological studies have found a high prevalence of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction (PFD) among female athletes. However, according to several authors, these data could even be underestimated, both in research and clinical practice. Screening for potential PFD is often delayed and risk factors are not often evaluated. As a consequence, withdrawal from sport, negative influence on performance, worsening symptoms and unrecognized diagnosis may occur. The aim of our research is to develop a screening tool for pelvic floor dysfunction in female athletes useful for clinicians (musculoskeletal/sport physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, team physicians) to guide referral to a PFD expert (e.g. pelvic floor/womens health physiotherapist, gynecologist, uro-gynecologist, urologist). MethodsA 2-round modified Delphi study will be conducted to ascertain expert opinion on which combination of variables and risk factors should be included in the screening tool. ConclusionThe implementation of the present screening tool into clinical practice may facilitate the referral to a PFD expert for further assessment of the pelvic floor and therefore, to identify potential dysfunction and, eventually, the related treatment pathway.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intra- and inter-rater reliability, agreement, and minimal detectable change of the handheld dynamometer in individuals with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis 95%
- Designing multimedia patient education materials for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial of patient education videos 95%
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Yoruba version of Oswestry disability index 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 95%
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing core osteoarthritis treatments in China: a mixed-method study 95%
- Protocol for a prospective cohort study on the feasibility of application of nutritional ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with nutritional risk at hospital discharge: Study on body composition and function (DRECO) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perception of yips among professional Japanese golfers: perspectives and challenges 95%
- Immediate effect of osteopathic techniques on human resting muscle tone in healthy subjects using myotonometry: A factorial randomized trial 94%
- Characteristics of patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the low back 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gynaecological health patterns and motherhood experiences of female professional football players 96%
- Successful reboot of high-performance sporting activities by Japanese national women’s handball team in Tokyo, 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic: An initiative by Japan Sports-Cyber Physical System (JS-CPS) of Sports Research Innovation Project (SRIP) 93%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rehabilitation with and without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in stroke patients: a study protocol for a multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the effectiveness, acceptability, usability, and economic-organizational sustainability of RADTs from subacute to chronic phase (STROKEFIT4) 94%
- Changes in back pain scores after bariatric surgery in obese patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Does Time to Theatre Affect The Ability to Achieve Fracture Reduction in Tibial Plateau Fractures? 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.