How do growth and nutrition explain social inequalities in lung function in children with cystic fibrosis? A longitudinal mediation analysis using interventional disparity effects with time-varying mediators and intermediate confounders.
Schlueter, D. K.; Keogh, R.; Daniel, R.; Agbla, S.; Taylor-Robinson, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundDeprivation is associated with poorer growth, worse lung function and shorter life expectancy in children with cystic fibrosis (CF). While early growth is associated with lung function when first measured at around age 6, it is unclear whether improving early growth in the most disadvantaged children would reduce inequalities in lung function. MethodsWe used data from children born 2000-2010 and followed up to 2016 in the UK CF Registry. To estimate the association between deprivation and lung function at around age six, and the causal contribution of early weight trajectories, we extended the mediation analysis approach based on interventional disparity effects to the setting of a longitudinally measured mediator. We adjusted for baseline confounding by sex, birthyear and genotype and accounted for time-varying intermediate confounding by lung infection. Results853 children were included in the study, including 165 and 172 children from the least and most deprived population quintiles, respectively. The average difference in lung function between the least and most deprived quintile of children, was 4.51 percent of predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (95% CI: 1.08 - 7.93). We estimated this would be reduced to 3.97 percentage points (95% CI: 0.57 - 7.38) if early weight trajectories in the most deprived children were shifted to the distribution observed in the least disadvantaged children. ConclusionSocio-economic conditions are strongly associated with lung function for children with CF which we estimated would only be marginally reduced if early weight trajectories could be improved for the most disadvantaged children.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction and stratification of longitudinal risk for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease across smoking behaviors 91%
- Within-family studies for Mendelian randomization: avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases 91%
- The UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy and childhood hospital admissions for asthma in England 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between household composition and severe COVID-19 outcomes in older people by ethnicity: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform 90%
- Reweighting the UK Biobank to reflect its underlying sampling population substantially reduces pervasive selection bias due to volunteering 90%
- The Causal Effects of Health Conditions and Risk Factors on Social and Socioeconomic Outcomes: Mendelian Randomization in UK Biobank 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Asthma hospitalisations and heat exposure in England: A case-crossover study during 2002-2019 91%
- The protective effect of club cell secretory protein (CC-16) on COPD risk and progression: a Mendelian randomisation study 90%
- Pulmonary Fibrosis after COVID-19 is Associated with Severity of Illness and Blood Leukocyte Telomere Length 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A longitudinal causal graph analysis investigating modifiable risk factors and obesity in a European cohort of children and adolescents 91%
- The Impact of Late-Career Job Loss and Genotype on Body Mass Index 90%
- Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes among shielded and non-shielded populations: A general population cohort study of 1.3 million 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation 92%
- How to mitigate selection bias in COVID-19 surveys: evidence from five national cohorts 90%
- Characterising patterns of COVID-19 and long COVID symptoms: Evidence from nine UK longitudinal studies 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.