Back

Cohort-specific serological recognition of SARS-CoV-2 variant RBD antigens

Fraser, D. D.; Miller, M. R.; Martin, C. M.; Slessarev, M.; Hahn, P.; Higgins, I.; Melo, C.; Pest, M. A.; Rothery, N.; Wang, X.; Zeidler, J.; Cruz-Aguado, J. A.

2022-01-11 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.01.10.21268250 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEstimating the response of different cohorts (e.g. vaccinated or critically ill) to new SARS-CoV-2 variants is important to customize measures of control. Thus, our goal was to evaluate binding of antibodies from sera of infected and vaccinated people to different antigens expressed by SARS-CoV-2 variants. MethodsWe compared sera from vaccinated donors with sera from four patient/donor cohorts: critically ill patients admitted to an intensive care unit (split in sera collected between 2 and 7 days after admission and more than ten days later), a NIBSC/WHO reference panel of SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals, and ambulatory or hospitalized (but not critically ill) positive donors. Samples were tested with an anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG serological assay designed with microplates coated with a SARS-CoV-2 RBD recombinant antigen. The same sample sets were also tested with microplates coated with antigens harbouring RBD mutations present in eleven of the most widespread variants. ResultsSera from vaccinated individuals exhibited higher antibody binding (P<0.001) than sera from infected (but not critically ill) individuals when tested against the WT and each of 11 variants RBD. The optical density generated by sera from non-critically ill convalescence individuals upon binding to variants antigens was different (P<0.05) from that of the WT in some variants--noteworthy, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Delta Plus variants. ConclusionsUnderstanding differences in binding and neutralizing antibody titers against WT vs variant RBD antigens from different donor cohorts can help design variant-specific immunoassays and complement other diagnostic and clinical data to evaluate the epidemiology of new variants.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.