Back

Two-photon patterned photostimulation with low-power, high-efficiency and reliable single-cell optogenetic control

Wang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Xu, Y.; Li, R.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, X.-M.; Hu, H.; Duan, S.; Gong, W.; Si, K.

2022-01-10 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.01.08.475477 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Two-photon optogenetics enables selectively stimulating individual cells for manipulating neuronal ensembles. As the general photostimulation strategy, the patterned two-photon excitation has enabled millisecond-timescale activation for single or multiple neurons, but its activation efficiency is suffered from high laser power due to low beam-modulation efficiency. Here, we develop a high- efficiency beam-shaping method based on the Gerchberg-Saxton (GS) algorithm with spherical-distribution initial phase (GSSIP) to reduce the patterned two-photon excitation speckles and intensity. It can well control the phase of shaped beams to attain speckle-free accurate patterned illumination with an improvement of 44.21% in the modulation efficiency compared with that of the traditional GS algorithm. A combination of temporal focusing and the GSSIP algorithm (TF-GSSIP) achieves patterned focusing through 500-m-thickness mouse brain slices, which is 2.5 times deeper than the penetration depth of TF-GS with the same signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). With our method, the laser power can be reduced to only 55.56% of that with traditional method (the temporal focusing with GS, TF-GS) to reliably evoke GCaMP6s response in C1V1-expressing cultured neurons with single-cell resolution. Besides, the photostimulation efficiency is remarkably increased by 80.19% at the same excitation density of 0.27 mW/m2. This two-photon stimulation method with low-power, reliable and patterned illumination may pave the way for analyzing neural circuits and neural coding and decoding mechanism.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.