Estimation of the test to test distribution as a proxy for generation interval distribution for the Omicron variant in England
Abbott, S.; Sherratt, K.; Gerstung, M.; Funk, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundEarly estimates from South Africa indicated that the Omicron COVID-19 variant may be both more transmissible and have greater immune escape than the previously dominant Delta variant. The rapid turnover of the latest epidemic wave in South Africa as well as initial evidence from contact tracing and household infection studies has prompted speculation that the generation time of the Omicron variant may be shorter in comparable settings than the generation time of the Delta variant. MethodsWe estimated daily growth rates for the Omicron and Delta variants in each UKHSA region from the 23rd of November to the 23rd of December 2021 using surveillance case counts by date of specimen and S-gene target failure status with an autoregressive model that allowed for time-varying differences in the transmission advantage of the Delta variant where the evidence supported this. By assuming a gamma distributed generation distribution we then estimated the generation time distribution and transmission advantage of the Omicron variant that would be required to explain this time varying advantage. We repeated this estimation process using two different prior estimates for the generation time of the Delta variant first based on household transmission and then based on its intrinsic generation time. ResultsVisualising our growth rate estimates provided initial evidence for a difference in generation time distributions. Assuming a generation time distribution for Delta with a mean of 2.5-4 days (90% credible interval) and a standard deviation of 1.9-3 days we estimated a shorter generation time distribution for Omicron with a mean of 1.5-3.2 days and a standard deviation of 1.3-4.6 days. This implied a transmission advantage for Omicron in this setting of 160%-210% compared to Delta. We found similar relative results using an estimate of the intrinsic generation time for Delta though all estimates increased in magnitude due to the longer assumed generation time. ConclusionsWe found that a reduction in the generation time of Omicron compared to Delta was able to explain the observed variation over time in the transmission advantage of the Omicron variant. However, this analysis cannot rule out the role of other factors such as differences in the populations the variants were mixing in, differences in immune escape between variants or bias due to using the test to test distribution as a proxy for the generation time distribution.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of children in the spread of COVID-19: Using household data from Bnei Brak, Israel, to estimate the relative susceptibility and infectivity of children 94%
- Near-term forecasting of Covid-19 cases and hospitalisations in Aotearoa New Zealand 94%
- Bayesian modelling of repeated cross-sectional epidemic prevalence survey data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling pooling strategies for SARS-CoV-2 testing in a university setting 91%
- Estimating required lockdown cycles before immunity to SARS-CoV-2: Model-based analyses of susceptible population sizes, S0, in seven European countries including the UK and Ireland 90%
- Limits of lockdown: characterising essential contacts during strict physical distancing 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the trend of COVID-19 in Norway by combining multiple surveillance indicators 93%
- Sorting out assortativity: when can we assess the contributions of different population groups to epidemic transmission? 93%
- Understanding the immunological landscape of England during SARS-CoV2 Omicron variant wave 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatio-temporal surveillance and early detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern: a retrospective analysis 93%
- Modelling the impact of household size distribution on the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 92%
- A novel, scenario-based approach to comparing non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies across nations 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.