Back

Estimation of the test to test distribution as a proxy for generation interval distribution for the Omicron variant in England

Abbott, S.; Sherratt, K.; Gerstung, M.; Funk, S.

2022-01-10 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.01.08.22268920 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEarly estimates from South Africa indicated that the Omicron COVID-19 variant may be both more transmissible and have greater immune escape than the previously dominant Delta variant. The rapid turnover of the latest epidemic wave in South Africa as well as initial evidence from contact tracing and household infection studies has prompted speculation that the generation time of the Omicron variant may be shorter in comparable settings than the generation time of the Delta variant. MethodsWe estimated daily growth rates for the Omicron and Delta variants in each UKHSA region from the 23rd of November to the 23rd of December 2021 using surveillance case counts by date of specimen and S-gene target failure status with an autoregressive model that allowed for time-varying differences in the transmission advantage of the Delta variant where the evidence supported this. By assuming a gamma distributed generation distribution we then estimated the generation time distribution and transmission advantage of the Omicron variant that would be required to explain this time varying advantage. We repeated this estimation process using two different prior estimates for the generation time of the Delta variant first based on household transmission and then based on its intrinsic generation time. ResultsVisualising our growth rate estimates provided initial evidence for a difference in generation time distributions. Assuming a generation time distribution for Delta with a mean of 2.5-4 days (90% credible interval) and a standard deviation of 1.9-3 days we estimated a shorter generation time distribution for Omicron with a mean of 1.5-3.2 days and a standard deviation of 1.3-4.6 days. This implied a transmission advantage for Omicron in this setting of 160%-210% compared to Delta. We found similar relative results using an estimate of the intrinsic generation time for Delta though all estimates increased in magnitude due to the longer assumed generation time. ConclusionsWe found that a reduction in the generation time of Omicron compared to Delta was able to explain the observed variation over time in the transmission advantage of the Omicron variant. However, this analysis cannot rule out the role of other factors such as differences in the populations the variants were mixing in, differences in immune escape between variants or bias due to using the test to test distribution as a proxy for the generation time distribution.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
3
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
4
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
7
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
24
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
26
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
27
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
28
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
29
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%