COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness among healthcare workers in Portugal: results from a hospital-based cohort study, December 2020 to November 2021
Gaio, V.; Silva, A.; Amaral, P.; Viana, J. F.; Leite, P. P.; Dias, C. M.; Kislaya, I.; Nunes, B.; Machado, A.
Show abstract
IntroductionHealthcare workers (HCW) were amongst the first prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination but data on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness among HCW is still limited. This study aims to estimate the COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic infection among HCW from Portuguese hospitals. MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, we analysed data from HCW (all professional categories) from two central hospitals in the Lisbon and Tagus Valley and Centre regions of mainland Portugal between December 2020 and November 2021. VE against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was estimated as one minus the confounder adjusted hazard ratios by Cox models considering age group, sex, presence of chronic disease and occupational exposure to patients diagnosed with COVID-19 as adjustment variables. ResultsDuring the 11 months of follow up, the 2213 HCW contributed a total of 1950 person-years at risk and 171 SARS-CoV-2 events occurred. The COVID-19 incidence rate for unvaccinated HCW was 348.7 per 1000 person-years while for fully vaccinated HCW was 43.0 per 1000 person-years. We observed a VE against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection of 73.9% (95% CI: 26.2-90.8%) for complete vaccination status. ConclusionThis cohort study found a high COVID-19 VE against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in Portuguese HCW, which is in concordance with previous studies from other countries. Monitoring of VE in this HCW cohort continues during the winter 2021/2022 to evaluate potential VE decay and booster vaccine effect.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 new infections among health care workers after the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine 97%
- SARS-CoV-2 Exposures of Healthcare Workers from Primary Care, Long-Term Care Facilities and Hospitals: A Nationwide Matched Case-Control Study 95%
- Bivalent BNT162b2mRNA original/Omicron BA.4-5 booster vaccination: adverse reactions and inability to work compared to the monovalent COVID-19 booster 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among healthcare workers in Germany 95%
- Persistent health issues, adverse events of significant concern, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination- findings from a real-world cohort study of healthcare workers in north India 95%
- COMPARATIVE IMMUNOGENICITY OF BNT162b2 mRNA VACCINE WITH NATURAL COVID-19 INFECTION 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2-antibody response in health care workers after vaccination or natural infection in a longitudinal observational study 94%
- Occupation, Worker Vulnerability, and COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake: Analysis of the Virus Watch prospective cohort study 94%
- Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 anti-s IgG after BNT162b2 vaccination 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against laboratory confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 related hospitalizations and deaths, among individuals aged 65 years or more in Portugal: a cohort study based on data-linkage of national registries February-September 2021 95%
- Professional practice for COVID-19 risk reduction among health care workers: a Cross-Sectional Study with Matched Case-Control Comparison 94%
- Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among Those Up-to-Date and Not Up-to-Date on COVID-19 Vaccination 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infections among healthcare personnel in Pakistan: a test-negative, case-control study 94%
- SARS-CoV-2 serostatus of healthcare worker in the Austrian state Vorarlberg between June 2020 and January 2021 93%
- High risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among frontline healthcare workers in Northeast Brazil: a respondent-driven sampling approach 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.