Back

Fully Vaccinated and Boosted Patients Requiring Hospitalization for COVID-19: an Observational Cohort Analysis

Mielke, N.; Johnson, S.; Bahl, A.

2022-01-05 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.01.05.22268626 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveReal-world data on the effectiveness of boosters against COVID-19, especially as new variants continue to emerge, is limited. It is our objective to assess demographic, clinical, and outcome variables of patients requiring hospitalization for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection comparing fully vaccinated and boosted (FV&B) and unvaccinated (UV) patients. MethodsThis multicenter observational cohort analysis compared demographic, clinical, and outcome variables in FV&B and UV adults hospitalized for COVID-19. A sub-analysis of FV&B patients requiring intensive care (ICU) care versus non-ICU care was performed to describe and analyze common symptom presentations, initial vital signs, initial laboratory workup, and pertinent medication use in these two groups. ResultsBetween August 12th, 2021 and December 6th, 2021, 4,571 patient encounters had a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 and required inpatient treatment at an acute-care hospital system in Southeastern Michigan. Of the 4,571 encounters requiring hospitalization, 65(1.4%) were FV&B and 2,935(64%) were UV. FV&B individuals were older (74 [67, 81] vs 58 [45, 70]; p <0.001) with a higher proportion of immunocompromised individuals (32.3% vs 10.4%; p<0.001). Despite a significantly higher baseline risk of in-hospital mortality in the FV&B group compared to the UV (Elixhauser 16 vs 8 (p <0.001)), there was a trend toward lower in-hospital mortality (7.7% vs 12.1%; p=0.38) among FV&B patients. Other severe outcomes followed this same trend, with 7.7% of FV&B vs 11.1% UV patients needing mechanical ventilation and 4.6% vs 10.6% of patients needing vasopressors in each group, respectively (p=0.5 and 0.17). ConclusionsFully vaccinated and boosted individuals requiring hospital-level care for breakthrough COVID-19 tended to have less severe outcomes despite appearing to be higher risk at baseline when compared to unvaccinated individuals during the same time period. Specifically, there was a trend that FV&B group had lower rates of mechanical ventilation, use of vasopressors, and in-hospital mortality. As COVID-19 continues to spread, larger expansive trials are needed to further identify risk factors for severe outcomes among the FV&B population.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.7%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
5
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
7
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
8
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
19
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
21
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
24
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
25
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%