Back

Lineage replacement and evolution captured by the United Kingdom Covid Infection Survey

Lythgoe, K. A.; Golubchik, T.; Hall, M.; House, T.; MacIntyre-Cockett, G.; Fryer, H.; Thomson, L.; Nurtay, A.; Buck, D.; Green, A.; Trebes, A.; Piazza, P.; Lonie, L. J.; Studley, R.; Rourke, E.; Cook, D.; Smith, D.; Bashton, M.; Nelson, A.; Crown, M.; McCann, C.; Young, G. R.; de Santos, R. A. N.; Richards, Z.; Tariq, A.; Wellcome Sanger Institute COVID-19 Surveillance Team, ; COVID-19 Infection Survey Group, ; The COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) consortium, ; Fraser, C.; Diamond, I.; Barrett, J.; Walker, S.; Bonsall, D.

2022-01-06 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.01.05.21268323 medRxiv
Show abstract

The Office for National Statistics COVID-19 Infection Survey (ONS-CIS) is the largest surveillance study of SARS-CoV-2 positivity in the community, and collected data on the United Kingdom (UK) epidemic from April 2020 until March 2023 before being paused. Here, we report on the epidemiological and evolutionary dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 determined by analysing the sequenced samples collected by the ONS-CIS during this period. We observed a series of sweeps or partial sweeps, with each sweeping lineage having a distinct growth advantage compared to their predecessors. The sweeps also generated an alternating pattern in which most samples had either S-gene target failure (SGTF) or non- SGTF over time. Evolution was characterised by steadily increasing divergence and diversity within lineages, but with step increases in divergence associated with each sweeping major lineage. This led to a faster overall rate of evolution when measured at the between-lineage level compared to within lineages, and fluctuating levels of diversity. These observations highlight the value of viral sequencing integrated into community surveillance studies to monitor the viral epidemiology and evolution of SARS-CoV-2, and potentially other pathogens, particularly in the current phase of the pandemic with routine RT-PCR testing now ended in the community.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.