Volatile anesthetics inhibit presynaptic cGMP signaling to depress presynaptic excitability in rat hippocampal neurons
Speigel, I. A.; Osman, V.; Hemmings, H. C.
Show abstract
Volatile anesthetics alter presynaptic function including effects on Ca2+ influx and neurotransmitter release. These actions are proposed to play important roles in their pleiotropic neurophysiological effects including unconsciousness and amnesia. The nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (NO/cGMP) signaling pathway has been implicated in presynaptic mechanisms, and disruption of NO/cGMP signaling has been shown to alter sensitivity to volatile anesthetics in vivo. We investigated NO/cGMP signaling in relation to volatile anesthetic actions in cultured rat hippocampal neurons using pharmacological tools and genetically encoded biosensors of cGMP levels. Using the fluorescent biosensor cGull we found that electrical stmulation-evoked NMDA-type glutamate receptor-independent presynaptic cGMP transients were inhibited -33.2% by isoflurane (0.51 mM) and -23.8% by sevoflurane (0.57 mM) (p<0.0001) compared to a stimulation without anesthetic. Isoflurane and sevoflurane inhibition of stimulation-evoked increases in presynaptic Ca2+ concentration, measured with synaptophysin-GCaMP6f, and synaptic vesicle exocytosis, measured with synaptophysin-pHlourin, were reduced by in neurons expressing the cGMP scavenger sponGee. This reduction in anesthetic effect was recapitulated by inhibiting HCN channels, a cGMP-modulated effector that can facilitate glutamate release. We propose that volatile anesthetics depress presynaptic cGMP signaling and downstream effectors like HCN channels that are essential to presynaptic function and excitability. These findings identify a novel mechanism by which volatile anesthetics depress synaptic transmission via second messenger signaling involving the NO/cGMP pathway.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular pharmacology of selective NaV1.6 and dual NaV1.6 and NaV1.2 channel inhibitors that suppress excitatory neuronal activity ex vivo 94%
- Regulation of dopamine release by tonic activity patterns in the striatal brain slice 94%
- Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial antagonist polyamides from tunicates and their predatory sea slugs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Delta glutamate receptor conductance drives excitation of dorsal raphe neurons 95%
- Inhibitory ultrapotent chemogenetics activate dopamine D1 receptor-expressing medium spiny neurons 95%
- Opposing actions of co-released GABA and neurotensin on the activity of preoptic neurons and on body temperature 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Oxytocin via oxytocin receptor excites neurons in the endopiriform nucleus of juvenile mice 95%
- Calretinin-expressing islet cells: a source of pre- and post-synaptic inhibition of non-peptidergic nociceptor input to the mouse spinal cord 95%
- Inhibitory synaptic transmission is impaired at higher extracellular Ca2+ concentrations in Scn1a+/- mouse model of Dravet syndrome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extrasynaptic NMDA receptors bidirectionally modulate intrinsic excitability of inhibitory neurons 96%
- Altered A-type potassium channel function impairs dendritic spike initiation and temporammonic long-term potentiation in Fragile X syndrome 95%
- A pathogenic missense mutation in kainate receptors elevates dendritic excitability and synaptic integration through dysregulation of SK channels 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Astrocyte gap junctions and Kir channels contribute to K+ buffering and regulate neuronal excitability 95%
- Dopaminergic neuromodulation of spike timing dependent plasticity in mature adult rodent and human cortical neurons 94%
- Pharmacological determination of the fractional block of Nav channels required to impair neuronal excitability and ex vivo seizures 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.