The last missing piece of the Triangle of U: the evolution of the tetraploid Brassica carinata genome
Yim, W. C.; Swain, M. L.; Ma, D.; An, H.; Bird, K. A.; Curdie, D. D.; Wang, S.; Ham, H. D.; Luzuriaga-Neira, A.; Kirkwood, J. S.; Hur, M.; Solomon, J. K. Q.; Harper, J. F.; Kosma, D. K.; Alvarez-Ponce, D.; Cushman, J. C.; Edger, P. P.; Mason, A. S.; Pires, J. C.; Tang, H.; Zhang, X.
Show abstract
Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata) is an ancient crop with significant potential for expanded cultivation as a biodiesel feedstock. The remarkable stress resilience of B. carinata and desirable seed fatty acid profile addresses the ongoing food vs. fuel debate as the crop is productive on marginal lands otherwise not suitable for even closely related species. B. carinata is one of six key Brassica spp. that share three major genomes: three diploid species (AA, BB, CC) that spontaneously hybridized in a pairwise manner, forming three allotetraploid species (AABB, AACC, and BBCC). Each of these genomes has been researched extensively, except for that of B. carinata. In the present study, we report a high-quality, 1.31 Gbp genome with 156.9-fold sequencing coverage for B. carinata var. Gomenzer, completing and confirming the classic Triangle of U, a theory of the evolutionary relationships among these six species that arose almost a century ago. Our assembly provides insights into the genomic features that give rise to B. carinatas superior agronomic traits for developing more climate-resilient Brassica crops with excellent oil production. Notably, we identified an expansion of transcription factor networks and agronomically-important gene families. Completing the Triangle of U comparative genomics platform allowed us to examine the dynamics of polyploid evolution and the role of subgenome dominance in domestication and agronomical improvement.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Citrullus genus super-pangenome reveals extensive variations in wild and cultivated watermelons and sheds light on watermelon evolution and domestication 97%
- Chromosome-level Thlaspi arvense genome provides new tools for translational research and for a newly domesticated cash cover crop of the cooler climates 97%
- A reference genome assembly of the alpine forage grass Elymus nutans 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole Genome Assembly and Annotation of Northern Wild Rice, Zizania palustris L., Supports a Whole Genome Duplication in the Zizania Genus 98%
- Genome and transcriptome architecture of allopolyploid okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) 97%
- Polyploidization events shaped the transcription factor repertoires in legumes (Fabaceae) 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pan-genome analysis of different morphotypes reveals genomic basis of Brassica oleracea domestication and differential organogenesis 97%
- Comparative Phylogenomics and Phylotranscriptomics Provide Insights into the Genetic Complexity of Nitrogen Fixing Root Nodule Symbiosis 96%
- A near-complete genome sequence of einkorn wheat provides insight into the evolution of wheat A subgenomes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The genome of Gynandropsis gynandra provides insights into whole-genome duplications and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis in Cleomaceae 98%
- Gene expression evolution in pattern-triggered immunity within Arabidopsis thaliana and across Brassicaceae species 96%
- Species-specific gene duplication in Arabidopsis thaliana evolved novel phenotypic effects on morphological traits under strong positive selection 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Streptochaeta genome and the evolution of the grasses 97%
- Chromosome-level genome assemblies for two quinoa inbred lines from northern and southern highlands of Altiplano where quinoa originated 97%
- A birds-eye view: exploration of the flavin-containing monooxygenase (FMO) superfamily in common wheat. 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.