Barriers To The Use Of Methylphenidate In Paediatric Neuro-Oncology Services
Hagan, A.; Bailey, S.; Verity, S. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe increasing effectiveness of childhood cancer treatment has resulted in a greater number of children surviving previously incurable central nervous system tumours. This growing population of survivors report significant treatment-related difficulties, including attentional impairment associated with poor long-term intellectual development, academic attainment, and health-related quality of life. Clinical findings show benefit to attention and executive functions following methylphenidate administration. The current project explored barriers associated with use of methylphenidate in paediatric neuro-oncology services in the UK. MethodQualitative data was gathered by semi-structured questionnaire sent to clinical psychologists/neuropsychologists in 19 of the 21 NHS primary treatment oncology centres in the UK in May 2018. Thematic analytic methods were used to explore the data. Results11 responses were received from primary treatment centres. Knowledge of the evidence base for methylphenidate in paediatric brain injury was limited. This was primarily attributable to the inadequate resource of psychology into many primary treatment centres, limiting provision to service to a restricted proportion of the patient group. Psychologists reported an interest in exploring the utility of methylphenidate in their patient group. Respondents highlighted the need for provision of accessible research summaries and treatment protocols addressing the potential use of psychostimulants, stating that these would support their team to consider expanding the interventions offered. ConclusionsThe development of shared resources for clinicians will be important in supporting the application of research findings to clinical practice. We anticipate national collaboration will support the advancement of intervention for the growing clinical population of long-term survivors.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Common Factors in Serious Case Reviews of Child Maltreatment where there is a Medical Cause of Death: Qualitative Thematic Analysis 91%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 90%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping young people’s journeys through mental health services: a prospective longitudinal qualitative study protocol 90%
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 90%
- Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Life beyond childhood: insight into the lived experience of 91 adults with KBG syndrome through an online patient/caregiver reported co-produced questionnaire 90%
- Changes in EEG microstate dynamics and cognition post-chemotherapy in people with breast cancer: A pilot study 87%
- Mental health status of the general population, healthcare professionals, and university students during 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak in Jordan: a cross-sectional study 85%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Paediatric Palliative Care following Hospital discharge: Prevalence and factors associated with non-continuity of palliative care for children with cancer in Busoga sub-region-eastern Uganda; A mixed methods study 91%
- Assessing the approach to perinatal mental health screening and treatment in maternal-child health clinics in Western Kenya 89%
- Economic evaluation of caregiver interventions for children with developmental disabilities: a scoping review 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.