Back

Precise measurement of nanoscopic septin ring structures in deep learning-assisted quantitative superresolution microscopy

Zehtabian, A.; Müller, P. M.; Goisser, M.; Obendorf, L.; Jänisch, L.; Hümpfer, N.; Rentsch, J.; Ewers, H.

2021-12-29 cell biology
10.1101/2021.12.28.474382 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The combination of image analysis and fluorescence superresolution microscopy methods allows for unprecedented insight into the organization of macromolecular assemblies in cells. Advances in deep learning-based object recognition enables the automated processing of large amounts of data, resulting in high accuracy through averaging. However, while the analysis of highly symmetric structures of constant size allows for a resolution approaching the dimensions of structural biology, deep learning methods are prone to different forms of bias. A biased recognition of structures may prohibit the development of readouts for processes that involve significant changes in size or shape of amorphous macromolecular complexes. What is required to overcome this problem is a detailed investigation of potential sources of bias and the rigorous testing of trained models using real or simulated data covering a wide dynamic range of possible results. Here we combine single molecule localization-based superresolution microscopy of septin ring structures with the training of several different deep learning models for a quantitative investigation of bias resulting from different training approaches and finally quantitative changes in septin ring structures. We find that trade-off exists between measurement accuracy and the dynamic range of recognized phenotypes. Using our trained models, we furthermore find that septin ring size can be explained by the number of subunits they are assembled from alone. Our work provides a new experimental system for the investigation of septin polymerization.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.2%
2
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.2%
4
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
5
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
6
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
10
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.0%
12
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
18
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Journal of Structural Biology: X
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
20
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
26
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%
28
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
29
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%