Back

OX40 agonism enhances efficacy of PD-L1 checkpoint blockade by shifting the cytotoxic T cell differentiation spectrum

Beyrend, G.; van der Sluis, T. C.; van der Gracht, E. T. I.; Abdelaal, T.; Jochems, S. P.; Belderbos, R. A.; Wesselink, T. H.; van Duikeren, S.; van Haften, F. J.; Redeker, A.; Beyranvand Nejad, E.; Camps, M.; Franken, K. L. M. C.; Linssen, M. M.; Hohenstein, P.; de Miranda, N. F. C. C.; Mei, H.; Bins, A. D.; Haanen, J. B. A. G.; Aerts, J. G.; Ossendorp, F.; Arens, R.

2021-12-25 immunology
10.1101/2021.12.24.474145 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has the potency to eradicate cancer but the mechanisms that determine effective versus non-effective therapy-induced immune responses are not fully understood. Here, using high-dimensional single-cell profiling we examined whether T cell states in the blood circulation could predict responsiveness to a combined ICT, sequentially targeting OX40 costimulatory and PD-1 inhibitory pathways, which effectively eradicated syngeneic mouse tumors. Unbiased assessment of transcriptomic alterations by single-cell RNA sequencing and profiling of cell-surface protein expression by mass cytometry revealed unique activation states for therapy-responsive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Effective ICT elicited T cells with dynamic expression of distinct NK cell and chemokine receptors, and these cells were systemically present in lymphoid tissues and in the tumor. Moreover, NK cell receptor-expressing CD8+ T cells were also present in the peripheral blood of immunotherapy-responsive cancer patients. Targeting of the NK cell and chemokine receptors in tumor-bearing mice showed their functional importance for therapy-induced anti-tumor immunity. These findings provide a better understanding of ICT and highlight the use of dynamic biomarkers on effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to improve cancer immunotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.