Back

Strain dependent structural effects and in vivo efficacy of enterovirus-D68 inhibitors

Lane, T. R.; Fu, J.; Sherry, B.; Tarbet, B.; Hurst, B.; Riabova, O.; Kazakova, E.; Egorova, A.; Clarke, P.; Leser, J. S.; Frost, J.; Rudy, M.; Tyler, K.; Klose, T.; Kuhn, R. J.; Makarov, V.; Ekins, S.

2021-12-27 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2021.12.24.474126 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) leads to loss of limb control in young children and is likely due to Enterovirus-D68 (EV-D68), for which there is no current treatment. We have developed a lead isoxazole-3-carboxamide analog of pleconaril (11526092) which displayed potent inhibition of the pleconaril-resistant CVB3-Woodruff (IC50 6-20 nM), EV-D68 (IC50 58 nM), and other enteroviruses. A mouse respiratory model of EV-D68 infection, in which pleconaril is inactive, showed decreased viremia of 3 log units as well as statistically significant 1 log reduction in lung titer reduction at day 5 after treatment with 11526092. A cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of EV-D68 in complex with 11526092 suggests that the increased potency may be due to additional hydrophobic interactions. Cryo-EM structures of 11526092 and pleconaril demonstrate destabilization of EV-D68 (MO strain) compared to the previously described stabilization of EV-D68 (Fermon strain) with pleconaril, illustrating clear strain dependent mechanisms of this molecule. 11526092 represents a more potent inhibitor in vitro with in vivo efficacy providing a potential future treatment for EV-D68 and AFM, suggesting an improvement over pleconaril for further optimization. One-Sentence Summary11526092 demonstrates protein destabilization, improved in vitro potency and in vivo efficacy when compared with pleconaril against EV-D68.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.