Autism spectrum disorder trios from consanguineous populations are enriched for rare biallelic variants, identifying 32 new candidate genes
Harripaul, R.; Rabia, A.; Vasli, N.; Mikhailov, A.; Rodrigues, A.; Pastore, S. F.; Muhammad, T.; Madanagopal, T.; Hashmi, A.; Tran, C.; Stan, C.; Aw, K.; Azam, M.; Mahmood, S.; Heidari, A.; Qamar, R.; French, L.; Tripathy, S.; Agha, Z.; Iqbal, M.; Ghadami, M.; Santangelo, S.; Bita Bozorgmehr, B.; Al Ayadhi, L.; Sasanfar, R.; Maqbool, S.; Knowles, J. A.; Ayub, M.; Vincent, J. B.
Show abstract
BackgroundAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that affects about 1 in 36 children in the United States, imposing enormous economic and socioemotional burden on families and communities. Genetic studies of ASD have identified de novo copy number variants (CNVs) and point mutations that contribute significantly to the genetic architecture, but the majority of these studies were conducted in populations unsuited for detecting autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance. However, several ASD studies in consanguineous populations point towards AR as an under-appreciated source of ASD variants. MethodsWe used whole exome sequencing to look for rare variants for ASD in 115 proband-mother-father trios from populations with high rates of consanguinity, namely Pakistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. Consanguinity was assessed through microarray genotyping. ResultsWe report 84 candidate disease-predisposing single nucleotide variants and indels, with 58% biallelic, 25% autosomal dominant/de novo, and the rest X-linked, in 39 trios. 52% of the variants were loss of function (LoF) or putative LoF (pLoF), and 47% nonsynonymous. We found an enrichment of biallelic variants, both in sixteen genes previously reported for AR ASD and/or intellectual disability (ID) and 32 previously unreported AR candidate genes (including DAGLA, ENPP6, FAXDC2, ILDR2, KSR2, PKD1L1, SCN10A, SHH, and SLC36A1). We also identified eight candidate biallelic exonic loss CNVs. ConclusionsThe significant enrichment for biallelic variants among individuals with high Froh coefficients, compared with low Froh, either in known or candidate AR genes, confirms that genetic architecture for ASD among consanguineous populations is different to non-consanguineous populations. Assessment of consanguinity may assist in the genetic diagnostic process for ASD.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exome sequencing of 457 autism families recruited online provides evidence for novel ASD genes 94%
- Association between genes regulating neural pathways for quantitative traits of speech and language disorders 93%
- Biallelic truncation variants in ATP9A are associated with a novel autosomal recessive neurodevelopmental disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How rare and common risk variation jointly affect liability for autism spectrum disorder 96%
- A meta-analysis of two high-risk prospective cohort studies reveals autism-specific transcriptional changes to chromatin, autoimmune, and environmental response genes in umbilical cord blood 95%
- Molecular architecture of the altered cortical complexity in autism 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Copy Number Variants and their Implications for Developmental and Behavioural Problems in Cleft Lip and/or Palate 94%
- The Dynamic Nature of Genetic Risk for Schizophrenia Within Genes Regulated by FOXP1 During Neurodevelopment 92%
- Systematic assessment of the contribution of structural variants to inherited retinal diseases 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cord blood DNA methylome in newborns later diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder reflects early dysregulation of neurodevelopmental and X-linked genes 95%
- Prematurity and Genetic Liability for Autism Spectrum Disorder 93%
- Systematic analysis of genetic and phenotypic characteristics reveals antisense oligonucleotide therapy potential for one-third of neurodevelopmental disorders 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.