Back

A Pattern Recognition Diagnostic Model to Restore and Emulate Knee Mobility

Sukmanto, B.; Packer, S.; Gulfam, M.; Hollinger, D.

2021-12-25 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2021.12.23.21267314 medRxiv
Show abstract

Electromyography (EMG) is an electrical voltage potential linked to muscle contraction, resulting in human joint motion, such as knee flexion. Knee injuries, such as knee osteoarthritis (KOA), disrupt functional mobility of the knee joint and subsequently atrophy the muscles controlling knee movement during activities of daily living (ADL). Consequently, weakened muscles exhibiting deteriorated EMG signal fidelity are hypothesized to have discernible signal patterns from a healthy individuals EMG signals. Pattern recognition algorithms are useful for mapping a set of complex inputs (EMG signals and knee angles) to classify knee health status (injured vs. healthy). A secondary outcome is to predict future knee angles from previous input signals to inform a robotic knee exoskeleton to apply real-time torque assistance to a patient during ADL. A Decision Tree Classifier, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, and a Feed Forward Neural Network (Fully Connected) were used for binary classification (healthy vs. injured). Partial Least Squares Regression, Decision Tree Regressor, and XGBoost were used to predict future joint angles for the regression task (knee angle prediction). Overall, the Random Forest Classifier had the best overall classification performance. XGBoost and Decision Tree Regression performed the best among regression algorithms for predicting real-time angles during walking while Partial Least Squares Regression performed the best during the standing tasks. In summary, our Machine Learning methods are useful for assisting clinicians and patients during physical rehabilitation by providing quantitative insight into the patients neuromuscular control of the knee.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
6
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
7
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
9
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
10
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
11
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
13
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
14
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
21
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%