Back

Waning immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 among vaccinees in Hong Kong

Peng, Q.; Zhou, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, M.; Liu, N.; Li, S.; Huang, H.; Yang, D.; Au, K.-K.; Wang, H.; Man, K.; Yuen, K.-Y.; Chen, Z.

2021-12-23 immunology
10.1101/2021.12.22.473934 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNearly 4 billion doses of the BioNTech-mRNA and Sinovac-inactivated vaccines have been administrated globally, yet different vaccine-induced immunity against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) remain incompletely investigated. MethodsWe compare the immunogenicity and durability of these two vaccines among fully vaccinated Hong Kong people. FindingsStandard BioNTech and Sinovac vaccinations were tolerated and induced neutralizing antibody (NAb) (100% and 85.7%) and spike-specific CD4 T cell responses (96.7% and 82.1%), respectively. The geometric mean NAb IC50 and median frequencies of reactive CD4 subsets were consistently lower among Sinovac-vaccinees than BioNTech-vaccinees. Against VOCs, NAb response rate and geometric mean IC50 against B1.351 and B.1.617.2 were significantly lower for Sinovac (14.3%, 15 and 50%, 23.2) than BioNTech (79.4%, 107 and 94.1%, 131). Three months after vaccinations, NAbs to VOCs dropped near to detection limit, along with waning memory T cell responses, mainly among Sinovac-vaccinees. InterpretationOur results indicate that Sinovac-vaccinees may face higher risk to pandemic VOCs breakthrough infection. FundingThis study was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council Collaborative Research Fund (C7156-20GF to Z.C and C1134-20GF); the National Program on Key Research Project of China (Grant 2020YFC0860600, 2020YFA0707500 and 2020YFA0707504); Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (JSGG20200225151410198 and JCYJ20210324131610027); HKU Development Fund and LKS Faculty of Medicine Matching Fund to AIDS Institute; Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Fund, Innovation and Technology Commission and generous donation from the Friends of Hope Education Fund. Z.C.s team was also partly supported by the Theme-Based Research Scheme (T11-706/18-N).

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.6%
2
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
4
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
5
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
6
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
7
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
9
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
12
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
18
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
21
Cell Research
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%