Back

The dual role of the RETINOBLASTOMA-RELATED protein in the DNA damage response is spatio-temporally coordinated by the interaction with LXCXE-containing proteins.

Zamora-Zaragoza, J.; Klap, K.; Heidstra, R.; Zhou, W.; Scheres, B.

2021-12-23 plant biology
10.1101/2021.12.22.473497 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Living organisms face threats to genome integrity caused by environmental challenges or metabolic errors in proliferating cells. To avoid the spread of mutations, cell division is temporarily arrested while repair mechanisms deal with DNA lesions. Afterwards, cells either resume division or respond to unsuccessful repair by withdrawing from the cell cycle and undergoing cell differentiation or cell death. How the success rate of DNA repair connects to the execution of cell death remains incompletely known, particularly in plants. Here we provide evidence that the Arabidopsis thaliana RETINOBLASTOMA-RELATED1 (RBR) protein, shown to play structural and transcriptional functions in the DNA damage response (DDR), coordinates these processes in time by successive interactions through its B-pocket sub-domain. Upon DNA damage induction, RBR forms nuclear foci; but the N849F substitution in the B-pocket, which specifically disrupts binding to LXCXE motif-containing proteins, abolishes RBR focus formation and leads to growth arrest. After RBR focus formation, the stress-responsive gene NAC044 arrests cell division. As RBR is released from nuclear foci, it can be bound by the conserved LXCXE motif in NAC044. RBR-mediated cell survival is inhibited by the interaction with NAC044. Disruption of NAC044-RBR interaction impairs the cell death response but is less important for NAC044 mediated growth arrest. Noteworthy, unlike many RBR interactors, NAC044 binds to RBR independent of RBR phosphorylation. Our findings indicate that the availability of the RBR B-pocket to interact with LXCXE-containing proteins couples RBR DNA repair functions and RBR transcriptional functions of in the cell death program.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Plant
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.8%
2
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.5%
3
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.6%
4
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
5
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.0%
7
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.7%
8
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
11
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.5%
13
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
14
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
15
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
16
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
17
Developmental Cell
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
18
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
20
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
21
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
23
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
24
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Plant Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%