A phosphorylation code regulates the multi-functional protein RETINOBLASTOMA-RELATED1 in Arabidopsis thaliana
Zamora-Zaragoza, J.; Klap, K.; Sanchez-Perez, J.; Vielle-Calzada, J.-P.; Scheres, B.
Show abstract
The RETINOBLASTOMA-RELATED (RBR) proteins play a central role coordinating cell division, cell differentiation and cell survival within an environmental and developmental context. These roles reflect RBR ability to engage in multiple protein-protein interactions (PPIs), which are regulated by multi-site phosphorylation. However the functional outcomes of RBR phosphorylation in multicellular organisms remain largely unexplored. Here we test the hypothesis that phosphorylation allows diversification of RBR functions in multicellular context. Using a representative collection of transgenic loss- and gain of function point mutations in RBR phosphosites, we analysed their complementation capacity in Arabidopsis thaliana root meristems. While the number of mutated residues often correlated to the phenotypic strength of RBR phosphovariants, phospho-sites contributed differentially to distinct phenotypes. For example, the pocket-domain has a greater influence on meristematic cell proliferation, whereas the C-terminal region associates to stem cell maintenance. We found combinatorial effects between the T406 phopspho-site with others in different protein domains. Moreover, a phospho-mimetic and a phospho-defective variant, both promoting cell death, indicate that RBR controls similar cell fate choices by distinct mechanisms. Thus, additivity and specificity of RBR phospho-sites fine tune RBR activity across its multiple roles. Interestingly, a mutation disrupting RBR interactions with the LXCXE motif suppresses dominant phospho-defective RBR phenotypes. By probing protein-protein interactions of RBR variants, we found that LXCXE-containing members of the DREAM complex constitute an important component of phosphorylation-regulated RBR function, but also that RBR participates in stress or environmental responses independently of its phosphorylation state. We conclude that developmental-related, but not stress- or environmental-related functions of RBR are defined and separable by a combinatorial phosphorylation code.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Constitutive activation of leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase signaling pathways by BAK1-interacting receptor-like kinase 3 chimera 96%
- Systematic histone H4 replacement in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals a role for H4R17 in regulating flowering time 96%
- Ectopic assembly of an auxin efflux control machinery shifts developmental trajectories 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR 115 integrates jasmonate and cytokinin signaling machineries to repress adventitious rooting in Arabidopsis 96%
- A Phosphorus-Limitation Induced, Functionally Conserved DUF506 Protein is a Repressor of Root Hair Elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana 96%
- Phosphorylation-Dependent Activation of the bHLH Transcription Factor ICE1/SCRM Promotes Polarization of the Arabidopsis Zygote 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- DET1-mediated COP1 regulation avoids HY5 activity over second-site targets to tune plant photomorphogenesis 97%
- The lncRNA APOLO interacts with the transcription factor WRKY42 to trigger root hair cell expansion in response to cold 96%
- Direct acetylation of the conserved threonine of an immune regulator by bacterial effectors activates RPM1-dependent immunity in Arabidopsis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterologous expression of a lycophyte protein enhances angiosperm seedling vigor 96%
- PILS proteins provide a homeostatic feedback on auxin signaling output 96%
- HD-Zip II transcription factors control distal stem cell fate in Arabidopsis roots by linking auxin signaling to the FEZ/SOMBRERO pathway 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.