Back

High Rate of Asymptomatic Carriage Associated with Variant Strain Omicron

Garret, N.; Tapley, A.; Andriesen, J.; Seocharan, I.; Fisher, L. H.; Bunts, L.; Espy, N.; Wallis, C.; Randhawa, A. K.; Goga, A.; Bekker, L.-G.; Gray, G. E.; Corey, L.

2021-12-27 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.12.20.21268130 medRxiv
Show abstract

The early widespread dissemination of Omicron indicates the urgent need to better understand the transmission dynamics of this variant, including asymptomatic spread among immunocompetent and immunosuppressed populations. In early December 2021, the Ubuntu clinical trial, designed to evaluate efficacy of the mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna) among persons living with HIV (PLWH), began enrolling participants. Nasal swabs are routinely obtained at the initial vaccination visit, which requires participants to be clinically well to receive their initial jab. Of the initial 230 participants enrolled between December 2 and December 17, 2021, 71 (31%) were PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2: all of whom were subsequently confirmed by S gene dropout to be Omicron; 48% of the tested samples had cycle threshold (CT) values <25 and 18% less than 20, indicative of high titers of asymptomatic shedding. Asymptomatic carriage rates were similar in SARS-CoV-2 seropositive and seronegative persons (27% respectively). These data are in stark contrast to COVID-19 vaccine studies conducted pre-Omicron, where the SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity rate at the first vaccination visit ranged from <1%-2.4%, including a cohort of over 1,200 PLWH largely enrolled in South Africa during the Beta outbreak. We also evaluated asymptomatic carriage in a sub study of the Sisonke vaccine trial conducted in South African health care workers, which indicated 2.6% asymptomatic carriage during the Beta and Delta outbreaks and subsequently rose to 16% in both PLWH and PHLWH during the Omicron period. These findings strongly suggest that Omicron has a much higher rate of asymptomatic carriage than other VOC and this high prevalence of asymptomatic infection is likely a major factor in the widespread, rapid dissemination of the variant globally, even among populations with high prior rates of SARS-COV-2 infection.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.7%
2
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
4
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.8%
6
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
7
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
8
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
10
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
11
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
13
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
21
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
23
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%