Keeping doors open: A cross-sectional survey of family physician practice patterns during COVID-19, needs, and intentions
Kiran, T.; Wang, R.; Handford, C.; Laraya, N.; Eissa, A.; Pariser, P.; Brown, R.; Pedersen, C.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo determine the extent to which family physicians closed their doors altogether or for in-person visits during the pandemic, their future practice intentions, and related factors. MethodsBetween March and June 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional survey using email, fax, and phone of 1,186 family doctors practicing comprehensive family medicine in Toronto, Ontario. We asked about practice patterns in January 2021, use of virtual care, and practice intentions. ResultsOf the 1,016 (86%) that responded to the survey, 99.7% (1001/1004) indicated their practice was open in January 2021 with 94.8% (928/979) seeing patients in-person and 30.8% (264/856) providing in-person care to patients reporting COVID-19 symptoms. Respondents estimated spending 58.2% of clinical care time on phone visits and an additional 5.8% on video and 7.5% on email. 17.2% (77/447) were planning to close their current practice in the next five years. There was a higher proportion of physicians who worked alone in a clinic among those who did not see patients in-person (27.6% no vs 12.4% yes, p<0.05), did not see symptomatic patients (15.6% no vs 6.5 % yes, p<0.001), and those who planned to close their practice in the next 5 years (28.9% yes vs 13.9% no, p<0.01). InterpretationThe vast majority of family physicians in Toronto were open to in-person care in January 2021 but almost one-fifth are considering closing their practice in the next five years. Policy-makers need to prepare for a growing family physician shortage and better understand factors that support recruitment and retention.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing focused practice: A qualitative study of resident and early-career family physician practice choices 97%
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 92%
- Suspected COVID-19 in primary care: how GP records contribute to understanding differences in prevalence by ethnicity. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of Burnout Among Academic Family Medicine Faculty: Looking Back to Plan forward 94%
- COVI-Prim survey: Challenges for Austrian and German general practitioners during initial phase of COVID-19 93%
- Development of the Tool for Advancing Practice Performance, a practice-level survey to assess primary care structures and processes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in patient attachment to an aging primary care workforce: a population-based serial cross-sectional study in Ontario, Canada 94%
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 93%
- Pre-Post Analysis of the Impact of British Columbia Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Clinics on Patient Health and Care Experience 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Primary Care Team Configuration on Access and Quality of Care 93%
- Association of patients’ past misdiagnosis experiences with trust in their current physician: the TRUMP 2 -Net study 92%
- An Evaluation of the Vulnerable Physician Workforce in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of residency training in family medicine on hospital admissions due to Ambulatory-care Sensitive Conditions in Rio de Janeiro 92%
- Snotwatch COVID-Toes: An ecological study of chilblains and COVID-19 diagnoses in Victoria, Australia 91%
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.