Intracranial Electric Field Recording During Multichannel Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
Wang, M.; Han, J.; Jiang, H.; Zhu, J.; Feng, W.; Chhatbar, P. Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundMultichannel transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) modeling and optimization have been widely studied in recent years. Its theoretical bases include quasi-static assumption and linear superposition. However, there is still a lack of direct in vivo evidence to validate the simulation model and theoretical assumptions. MethodsWe directly measured the multichannel tES-induced voltage changes with implanted stereotactic-electroencephalographic (sEEG) electrodes in 12 epilepsy subjects. By combining these measured data, we investigate the linear superposition and prediction accuracy of simulation models for multi-electrode stimulation and further compare the induced EF differences between transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). ResultsOur in vivo measurements demonstrated that the multi-electrode tES-induced voltages were almost equal to the sum of the voltages generated independently by bipolar stimulation. Both measured voltages and electric fields obtained in vivo were highly correlated with the predicted values in our cohort (Voltages: r = 0.92, p < 0.001; electric fields: r = 0.74, p < 0.001). Under the same stimulation intensity, the tDCS-induced peak-zero voltages were highly correlated with the values of tACS (r = 0.99, p < 0.001; s = 0.99). ConclusionsThe in vivo measurements provides confirmatory results for linear superposition and quasi-static assumption within the human brain. Furthermore, we found that the individualized simulation model reliably predicted the multi-electrode tES-induced electric fields.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Closed-loop optimization of transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography feedback 96%
- Multi-locus transcranial magnetic stimulation system for electronically targeted brain stimulation 96%
- Simultaneous stereo-EEG and high-density scalp EEG recordings to study the effects of intracerebral stimulation parameters 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Magnetic Temporal Interference for Noninvasive Focal Brain Stimulation 96%
- Non-invasive stimulation with Temporal Interference: Optimization of the electric field deep in the brain with the use of a genetic algorithm 94%
- Automated optimization of deep brain stimulation parameters for modulating neuroimaging-based targets 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Electrode positioning errors reduce current dose for focal tDCS set-ups: Evidence from individualized electric field mapping 94%
- Mapping short-latency cortical responses to electrical stimulation of thalamic motor nuclei by increasing sampling rate - a technical report 94%
- SC10X/U: A High-density Electrode System for Non-Invasive Recording of Neural Activity of the Cervical Spinal Cord 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Group and Individual Level Variations between Symmetric and Asymmetric DLPFC Montages for tDCS over Large Scale Brain Network Nodes 95%
- Multivariate pattern classification on BOLD activation pattern induced by deep brain stimulation in motor, associative, and limbic brain networks 95%
- Probabilistic comparison of gray and white matter coverage between depth and surface intracranial electrodes in epilepsy: a patient-specific modeling and empirical study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rattractor - Instant guidance of a rat into a virtual cage using a deep brain stimulation 95%
- Vibrotactile auricular vagus nerve stimulation alters limbic system connectivity in humans: A pilot study 95%
- Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T - 10.5 T 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.