Back

Diversity and Divergence: Evolution of defense chemistry in the tropical tree genus Inga

Forrister, D. L.; Endara, M.-J.; Soule, A. J.; Younkin, G. C.; Mills, A. G.; Lokvam, J.; Dexter, K. G.; Pennington, R. T.; Kidner, C. A.; Nichols, J. A.; Loiseau, O.; Kursar, T. A.; Coley, P. D.

2021-12-20 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2021.12.17.473194 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIPlants are widely recognized as chemical factories, with each species producing dozens to hundreds of unique secondary metabolites. These compounds shape the interactions between plants and their natural enemies. Here we explore how plants generate chemical diversity, and what evolutionary processes have led to novel compounds and unique chemical profiles. C_LIO_LIWe comprehensively characterized the chemical profile of one-third of the species of tropical rainforest trees in the genus Inga ([~] 100, Fabaceae) and applied phylogenetic comparative methods to understand the mode of chemical defense evolution. C_LIO_LIWe show that: 1) Each Inga species produces exceptionally high levels of phytochemical diversity, despite costs, tradeoffs and biosynthetic constraints. 2) Closely related species have highly divergent defense profiles, with individual compounds, major compound classes and complete profiles showing little to no phylogenetic signal. 3) We show that the evolution of a species chemical profile shows a signature of divergent adaptation, implying that it is advantageous for a species to have distinct chemistry from close relatives to avoid shared natural enemies. 4) Finally, we hypothesize a model where deep homology of biosynthetic pathways and rapid changes in regulatory mechanisms may better explain the observed large shifts in defense chemicals between closely related taxa. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.