Distinct N and C cross-feeding networks in a synthetic mouse gut consortium
Escriva, P. P.; Fuhrer, T.; Sauer, U.
Show abstract
The complex interactions between gut microbiome and host or pathogen colonization resistance cannot solely be understood from community composition. Missing are causal relationships such as metabolic interactions among species to better understand what shapes the microbiome. Here, we focused on metabolic niches generated and occupied by the Oligo-Mouse-Microbiota consortium, a synthetic community composed of 12 members that is increasingly used as a model for the mouse gut microbiome. Combining mono-cultures and spent medium experiments with untargeted metabolomics uncovered broad metabolic diversity in the consortium, constituting a dense cross-feeding network with more than 100 pairwise interactions. Quantitative analysis of the cross-feeding network revealed distinct C and N food webs that highlight the two Bacteroidetes consortium members B. caecimuris and M. intestinale as primary suppliers of carbon, and a more diverse group as nitrogen providers. Cross-fed metabolites were mainly carboxylic acids, amino acids, and the so far not reported nucleobases. In particular the dicarboxylic acids malate and fumarate provided a strong physiological benefit to consumers, presumably as anaerobic electron acceptors. Isotopic tracer experiments validated the fate of a subset of cross-fed metabolites, in particular the conversion of the most abundant cross-fed compound succinate to butyrate. Thus, we show that this consortium is tailored to produce the anti-inflammatory metabolite butyrate. Overall, we provide evidence for metabolic niches generated and occupied by OMM members that lays a metabolic foundation to facilitate understanding of the more complex in vivo behavior of this consortium in the mouse gut. ImportanceThis article maps out the cross-feeding network amongst 10 members of a synthetic consortium that is increasingly used as the model mouse gut microbiota. Combining metabolomics with in vitro cultivations, two dense networks of carbon and nitrogen exchange are described. The vast majority of the about 100 interactions are synergistic in nature, in several cases providing distinct physiological benefits to the recipient species. These networks lay the ground work towards understanding gut community dynamics and host-gut microbe interactions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Origin of biogeographically distinct ecotypes during laboratory evolution 97%
- Elucidating human gut microbiota interactions that robustly inhibit diverse Clostridioides difficile strains across different nutrient landscapes 96%
- Disease-specific loss of microbial cross-feeding interactions in the human gut 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolic modeling of microbial communities in the chicken ceca reveals a landscape of competition and co-operation 97%
- Stratification of human gut microbiomes by succinotype is associated with inflammatory bowel disease status 97%
- Revealing Interactions between Microbes, Metabolites, and Dietary Compounds using Genome-scale Analysis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Co-cultivation is a powerful approach to produce a robust functionally designed synthetic consortium as a live biotherapeutic product (LBP) 97%
- MRGM: An enhanced catalog of mouse gut microbial genomes substantially broadening taxonomic and functional landscapes 96%
- Gut microbiota-mediated conversion of mangiferin to norathyriol alters short chain fatty acid and urate metabolism 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A flexible high-throughput cultivation protocol to assess the response of individuals' gut microbiota to diet-, drug-, and host-related factors 97%
- Pairing Metagenomics and Metaproteomics to Characterize Ecological Niches and Metabolic Essentiality of gut microbiomes 95%
- Recoding enhances the metabolic capabilities of two novel methylotrophic Asgardarchaeota lineages 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.