Back

The Omicron variant mutation at position 28,311 in the SARS-CoV-2 N gene does not perturb CDC N1 target detection

Bei, Y.; Vrtis, K. B.; Borgaro, J. G.; Langhorst, B. W.; Nichols, N. M.

2021-12-17 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2021.12.16.21267734 medRxiv
Show abstract

The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants necessitates the reevaluation of current COVID-19 tests to ensure continued accuracy and reliability. The new SARS-CoV-2 variant, Omicron, is heavily mutated, with over 50 mutations within its RNA genome. Any of these mutations could adversely affect the ability of diagnostic assays to detect the virus in patient samples, potentially leading to inconclusive or false negative results. In fact, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has identified over two dozen diagnostic tests that contain a gene target that is expected to have "significantly reduced sensitivity due to a mutation in the SAS-CoV-2 Omicron variant"1. Additionally, one of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) targets for COVID-19 tests, 2019-nCoV_N1, overlaps an Omicron mutation within the sequence targeted by the fluorescent probe. This target from the CDC has been used in many other EUA assays. Using in vitro transcribed (IVT) N gene RNA representing the wild-type (GenBank/GISAID ID MN908947.3) and Omicron variant (BA.1, GISAID ID EPI_ISL_6752027), we evaluated the performance of two different amplification protocols, both of which include the CDC 2019-nCoV_N1 primer-probe set. Both assays were able to detect the mutant N1 sequence as efficiently as the wild-type sequence. Consequently, these data suggest that diagnostic assays that use the 2019-nCoV-N1 primer-probe set are unlikely to be impacted by currently circulating Omicron lineage viruses.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
2
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.3%
5
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
9
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
12
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
14
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
15
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
17
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
19
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
22
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%