The Omicron variant mutation at position 28,311 in the SARS-CoV-2 N gene does not perturb CDC N1 target detection
Bei, Y.; Vrtis, K. B.; Borgaro, J. G.; Langhorst, B. W.; Nichols, N. M.
Show abstract
The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants necessitates the reevaluation of current COVID-19 tests to ensure continued accuracy and reliability. The new SARS-CoV-2 variant, Omicron, is heavily mutated, with over 50 mutations within its RNA genome. Any of these mutations could adversely affect the ability of diagnostic assays to detect the virus in patient samples, potentially leading to inconclusive or false negative results. In fact, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has identified over two dozen diagnostic tests that contain a gene target that is expected to have "significantly reduced sensitivity due to a mutation in the SAS-CoV-2 Omicron variant"1. Additionally, one of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) targets for COVID-19 tests, 2019-nCoV_N1, overlaps an Omicron mutation within the sequence targeted by the fluorescent probe. This target from the CDC has been used in many other EUA assays. Using in vitro transcribed (IVT) N gene RNA representing the wild-type (GenBank/GISAID ID MN908947.3) and Omicron variant (BA.1, GISAID ID EPI_ISL_6752027), we evaluated the performance of two different amplification protocols, both of which include the CDC 2019-nCoV_N1 primer-probe set. Both assays were able to detect the mutant N1 sequence as efficiently as the wild-type sequence. Consequently, these data suggest that diagnostic assays that use the 2019-nCoV-N1 primer-probe set are unlikely to be impacted by currently circulating Omicron lineage viruses.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a rapid, saliva-based, and ultra-sensitive SARS-CoV-2 screening system for a pandemic-scale infection surveillance 96%
- Performance evaluation of a non-invasive one-step multiplex RT-qPCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 direct from human saliva 95%
- Sensitive detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Agile design and development of a high throughput cobas ® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR diagnostic test 96%
- Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the performance of the SARS-Cov-2 “AQ+ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test” from InTec on symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients 93%
- Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen diagnostic tests for saliva samples 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Implementation of a scalable and versatile test for COVID-19 diagnostics in rural communities 97%
- Laboratory validation of a clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing assay for respiratory virus detection and discovery 95%
- Deployable CRISPR-Cas13a diagnostic tools to detect and report Ebola and Lassa virus cases in real-time 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.