Back

Machine learning identified distinct serum lipidomic signatures in hospitalized COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients

Castane, H.; Iftimie, S.; Baiges-Gaya, G.; Rodriguez-Tomas, E.; Jimenez-Franco, A.; Lopez-Azcona, A. F.; Garrido, P.; Castro, A.; Camps, J.; Joven, J.

2021-12-16 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.12.14.21267764 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLipids are involved in the interaction between viral infection and the host metabolic and immunological response. Several studies comparing the lipidome of COVID-19-positive hospitalized patients vs. healthy subjects have already been reported. It is largely unknown, however, whether these differences are specific to this disease. The present study compared the lipidomic signature of hospitalized COVID-19-positive patients with that of healthy subjects, and with COVID-19-negative patients hospitalized for other infectious/inflammatory diseases. Potential COVID-19 biomarkers were identified. MethodsWe analyzed the lipidomic signature of 126 COVID-19-positive patients, 45 COVID-19-negative patients hospitalized with other infectious/inflammatory diseases and 50 healthy volunteers. Results were interpreted by machine learning. ResultsWe identified acylcarnitines, lysophosphatidylethanolamines, arachidonic acid and oxylipins as the most altered species in COVID-19-positive patients compared to healthy volunteers. However, we found similar alterations in COVID-19-negative patients. By contrast, we identified lysophosphatidylcholine 22:6-sn2, phosphatidylcholine 36:1 and secondary bile acids as the parameters that had the greatest capacity to discriminate between COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients. ConclusionThis study shows that COVID-19 infection shares many lipid alterations with other infectious/inflammatory diseases, but differentiating them from the healthy population. Also, we identified some lipid species the alterations of which distinguish COVID-19-positive from Covid-19-negative patients. Our results highlight the value of integrating lipidomics with machine learning algorithms to explore the pathophysiology of COVID-19 and, consequently, improve clinical decision making.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
8
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%