Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and prognosis in neuroimaging for dementia; a systematic review
Borchert, R. J.; Azevedo, T.; Badhwar, A.; Bernal, J.; Betts, M.; Bruffaerts, R.; Burkhart, M. C.; Dewachter, I.; Gellersen, H.; Low, A.; Machado, L.; Madan, C. R.; Malpetti, M.; Mejia, J.; Michopoulou, S.; Munoz-Neira, C.; Peres, M.; Phillips, V.; Ramanan, S.; Tamburin, S.; Tantiangco, H.; Thakur, L.; Tomassini, A.; Vipin, A.; Tang, E.; Newby, D.; Ranson, J.; Llewellyn, D.; Veldsman, M.; Rittman, T.
Show abstract
IntroductionRecent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) and neuroimaging offer new opportunities for improving diagnosis and prognosis of dementia. To synthesise the available literature, we performed a systematic review. MethodsWe systematically reviewed primary research publications up to January 2021, using AI for neuroimaging to predict diagnosis and/or prognosis in cognitive neurodegenerative diseases. After initial screening, data from each study was extracted, including: demographic information, AI methods, neuroimaging features, and results. ResultsWe found 2709 reports, with 252 eligible papers remaining following screening. Most studies relied on the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset (n=178) with no other individual dataset used more than 5 times. Algorithmic classifiers, such as support vector machine (SVM), were the most commonly used AI method (47%) followed by discriminative (32%) and generative (11%) classifiers. Structural MRI was used in 71% of studies with a wide range of accuracies for the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases and predicting prognosis. Lower accuracy was found in studies using a multi-class classifier or an external cohort as the validation group. There was improvement in accuracy when neuroimaging modalities were combined, e.g. PET and structural MRI. Only 17 papers studied non-Alzheimers disease dementias. ConclusionThe use of AI with neuroimaging for diagnosis and prognosis in dementia is a rapidly emerging field. We make a number of recommendations addressing the definition of key clinical questions, heterogeneity of AI methods, and the availability of appropriate and representative data. We anticipate that addressing these issues will enable the field to move towards meaningful clinical translation.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural Degeneration of the Nucleus basalis of Meynert in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease - Evidence from an MRI-based Meta-Analysis 93%
- A Systematic Review of the Quantitative markers of speech and language of the Frontotemporal Degeneration Spectrum and their potential for cross-linguistic implementation 92%
- Structural Brain Correlates of Cognitive Function in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dementia is strongly associated with medial temporal atrophy even after accounting for neuropathologies 93%
- The PREVENT Dementia programme: Baseline demographic, lifestyle, imaging and cognitive data from a midlife cohort study investigating risk factors for dementia 92%
- Whole-brain functional connectivity predicts regional tau PET in preclinical Alzheimer's disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medial temporal atrophy in preclinical dementia: visual and automated assessment during six year follow-up 95%
- Preliminary Validation of a Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Metric for Tracking Dementia-Related Neurodegeneration and Future Decline 95%
- MRI and cognitive scores complement each other to accurately predict Alzheimer’s dementia 2 to 7 years before clinical onset 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying the regional substrates predictive of Alzheimer’s disease progression through a convolutional neural network model and occlusion 95%
- Cross-dataset Evaluation of Dementia Longitudinal Progression Prediction Models 95%
- From Big Data to the clinic: methodological and statistical enhancements to implement the UK Biobank imaging framework in a memory clinic 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.