Detection of Motor-Evoked Potentials Below the Noise Floor: Rethinking the Motor Threshold
Li, Z.; Peterchev, A. V.; Rothwell, J. C.; Goetz, S. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundMotor-evoked potentials (MEP) are one of the most prominent responses to brain stimulation, such as supra-threshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation. Understanding of the neurophysiology and the determination of the lowest stimulation strength that evokes responses requires the detection of even smaller responses, e.g., from single motor units. However, available detection and quantization methods suffer from a large noise floor. ObjectiveThis paper develops a detection method that extracts MEPs hidden below the noise floor. With this method, we aim to estimate excitatory activations of the corticospinal pathways well below the conventional detection level. MethodsThe presented MEP detection method presents a self-learning matched-filter approach for improved robustness against noise. The filter is adaptively generated per subject through iterative learning. For responses that are reliably detected by conventional detection, the new approach is fully compatible with established peak-to-peak readings and provides the same results but extends the dynamic range below the conventional noise floor. ResultsIn contrast to the conventional peak-to-peak measure, the proposed method increases the signal-to-noise ratio by more than a factor of 5. The first detectable responses appear to be substantially lower than the conventional threshold definition of 50 V median peak-to-peak amplitude. ConclusionThe proposed method shows that stimuli well below the conventional 50 V threshold definition can consistently and repeatably evoke muscular responses and thus activate excitable neuron populations in the brain. As a consequence, the IO curve is extended at the lower end, and the noise cut-off is shifted. Importantly, the IO curve extends so far that the 50 V point turns out to be closer to the center of the logarithmic sigmoid curve rather than close to the first detectable responses. The underlying method is applicable to a wide range of evoked potentials and other biosignals, such as in electroencephalography.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Input-Output Slope Curve Estimation in Neural Stimulation Based on Optimal Sampling Principles 97%
- Three Novel Methods for Determining Motor Threshold with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Outperform Conventional Procedures 97%
- Adaptive HD-sEMG decomposition: Towards robust real-time decoding of neural drive 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Canonical Response Parameterization: Quantifying the structure of responses to single-pulse intracranial electrical brain stimulation 95%
- Circuits and mechanisms for TMS-induced corticospinal waves: Connecting sensitivityanalysis to the network graph 94%
- Selection of stimulus parameters for enhancing slow wave sleep events with a Neural-field theory thalamocortical computational model 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- M2M-InvNet: Human Motor Cortex Mapping from Multi-Muscle Response Using TMS and Generative 3D Convolutional Network 96%
- Forecast Padding Enhances Accuracy and Robustness of EEG-Phase-Synchronized TMS 96%
- Closed-loop control of functional electrical stimulation using a selectively recording and bidirectional nerve cuff interface 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The rt-TEP tool: real-time visualization of TMS-Evoked Potential to maximize cortical activation and minimize artifacts 94%
- Proper reference selection and re-referencing to mitigate bias in single pulse electrical stimulation data 94%
- Holo-Hilbert Spectral-based Noise Removal Method for EEG High-Frequency Bands 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.