Integration of visual motion and pursuit signals in areas V3A and V6+ across cortical depth using 9.4T fMRI
Molaei Vaneghi, F.; Zaretskaya, N.; Mourik, T. v.; Bause, J.; Scheffler, K.; Bartels, A.
Show abstract
Neural mechanisms underlying a stable perception of the world during pursuit eye movements are not fully understood. Both, perceptual stability as well as perception of real (i.e. objective) motion are the product of integration between motion signals on the retina and efference copies of eye movements. Human areas V3A and V6 have previously been shown to have strong objective ( real) motion responses. Here we used high-resolution laminar fMRI at ultra-high magnetic field (9.4T) in human subjects to examine motion integration across cortical depths in these areas. We found an increased preference for objective motion in areas V3A and V6+ i.e. V6 and possibly V6A towards the upper layers. When laminar responses were detrended to remove the upper-layer bias present in all responses, we found a unique, condition-specific laminar profile in V6+, showing reduced mid-layer responses for retinal motion only. The results provide evidence for differential, motion-type dependent laminar processing in area V6+. Mechanistically, the mid-layer dip suggests a special contribution of retinal motion to integration, either in the form of a subtractive (inhibitory) mid-layer input, or in the form of feedback into extragranular or infragranular layers. The results show that differential laminar signals can be measured in high-level motion areas in the human occipitoparietal cortex, opening the prospect of new mechanistic insights using non-invasive brain imaging. Significance StatementVisual stability and our ability to differentiate between self-induced and real motion are central to our visual sense. Both require the integration of two signals - retinal motion and copies of muscle commands used for eye movements (efference copies). A reasonable assumption is that either the efference copy or the result of integration will be conveyed to high-level visual regions along with visual retinal input, possibly differentially across cortical depth as the input sources differ. Our ultra-high field recordings present the first laminar evidence of differential signal processing of retinal and objective motion signals in area V6+, and present a first window into a mechanistic understanding of visual high-level motion processing.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Resolving the spatial profile of figure enhancement in human V1 through population receptive field modeling 96%
- Large-scale color biases in the retinotopic functional architecture are region specific and shared across human brains 96%
- Non-neural factors influencing BOLD response magnitudes within individual subjects 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Fine-scale computations for adaptive processing in the human brain 98%
- High resolution quantitative and functional MRI indicate lower myelination of thin and thick stripes in human secondary visual cortex 97%
- Mesoscale functional organization and connectivity of color, disparity, and naturalistic texture in human second visual area 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decoding of columnar-level organization across cortical depth using BOLD- and CBV-fMRI at 7 T 97%
- The temporal specificity of BOLD fMRI is systematically related to anatomical and vascular features of the human brain 96%
- Cortical Processing for the Vestibular and Visual Input of Egomotion in Macaque Monkeys: Separate Networks with Targeted Convergence 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Motion opponency examined throughout visual cortex with multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data 96%
- Development of the visual white matter pathways mediates development of electrophysiological responses in visual cortex 95%
- Separate and overlapping mechanisms of statistical regularities and salience processing in the occipital cortex and dorsal attention network 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.