Back

Population Optimally Immunized after Accounting for Type-Specific COVID-19 Vaccine Waning Intervals: State-Level Prevalence and Trends

Pathak, E. B.; Salemi, J. L.

2021-12-09 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.12.09.21267295 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDCOVID-19 vaccines exhibit real-world waning effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection within the first 3-6 months after a completed series. Consequently, the main metric tracked by the CDC (percent "fully vaccinated," with no adjustment for booster status) has become insufficiently informative. METHODSWe analyzed CDC daily vaccination data to quantify COVID-19 immunization status for 4 mutually-exclusive groups: (1) not immunized; (2) partially immunized (people who received the 1st dose of a 2-dose series); (3) immunized with waning immunity (previously immunized people whose booster dose is overdue); and (4) optimally immunized (people who: (a) received the Janssen vaccine <2 months ago or completed an mRNA vaccine series <6 months ago, or (b) received the Janssen vaccine >2 months ago or completed an mRNA vaccine series >6 months ago and received a booster dose.) RESULTSThe proportion of the total US population who were optimally immunized against COVID-19 fell from a high of 45.3% on July 17 to 29.4% on November 30. During November, the majority of states experienced a worsening trend in the percent of the total population who were overdue for a booster dose, including the 4 largest states, with percentage point increases of 3.5 in New York, 3.4 in California, 2.3 in Texas and 1.7 in Florida. CONCLUSIONSOur proposed classification scheme accounts for type-specific vaccine waning intervals, provides an accurate assessment of progress toward national immunization goals, and reveals the urgent need for additional public health mitigation strategies to successfully combat the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.