Protein interaction network analysis reveals growth conditions-specific crosstalk between chromosomal DNA replication and other cellular processes in E. coli
Morcinek-Orłowska, J.; Walter, B. M.; Forquet, R.; Cysewski, D.; Carlier, M.; Meyer, S.; Glinkowska, M. K.
Show abstract
E. coli and many other bacterial species can alter their cell cycle according to nutrient availability. Under optimal conditions bacteria grow and divide very fast but they slow down the cell cycle when conditions deteriorate. This adaptability is underlined by mechanisms coordinating cell growth with duplication of genetic material and cell division. Several mechanisms regulating DNA replication process in E. coli have been described with biochemical details so far. Nevertheless we still dont fully understand the source of remarkable precision that allows bacterial cells to coordinate their growth and chromosome replication. To shed light on regulation of E. coli DNA replication at systemic level, we used affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (AP-MS) to characterize protein-protein interactions (PPIs) formed by key E. coli replication proteins, under disparate bacterial growth conditions and phases. We present the resulting dynamic replication protein interaction network (PIN) and highlight links between DNA replication and several cellular processes, like outer membrane synthesis, RNA degradation and modification or starvation response. ImportanceDNA replication is a vital process, ensuring propagation of genetic material to progeny cells. Despite decades of studies we still dont fully understand how bacteria coordinate chromosomal DNA duplication with cell growth and cell division under optimal and stressful conditions. At molecular level, regulation of processes, including DNA replication, is often executed through direct protein-protein interactions (PPIs). In this work we present PPIs formed by the key E. coli replication proteins under three different bacterial growth conditions. We show novel PPIs with confirmed impact on chromosomal DNA replication. Our results provide also alternative explanations of genetic interactions uncovered before by others for E.coli replication machinery.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of Microviridae {varphi}X174 infection reveals broad up-regulation of host membrane damage and heat shock responses 95%
- Systems-wide analysis of the GATC-binding nucleoid-associated protein Gbn and its impact on Streptomyces development 95%
- Elucidation of regulatory modes for five two-component systems in Escherichia coli reveals novel relationships 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clostridioides difficile phosphoproteomics shows an expansion of phosphorylated proteins in stationary growth phase 95%
- Protein Interactomes Identify Distinct Pathways for Streptococcus mutans YidC1 and YidC2 Membrane Protein Insertases 94%
- Crucial role of ppGpp in the resilience of Escherichia coli to growth disruption 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The human innate immune protein calprotectin elicits a multi-metal starvation response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa 94%
- Manganese modulates metabolic activity and redox homeostasis in translationally-blocked Lactococcus cremoris, impacting metabolic persistence, cell-culturability, and flavor formation. 94%
- (p)ppGpp and DksA play crucial role in reducing the efficacy of b-lactam antibiotics by modulating bacterial membrane permeability 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA processing machineries in Archaea: the 5’-3’ exoribonuclease aRNase J of the β-CASP family is engaged specifically with the helicase ASH-Ski2 and the 3’-5’ exoribonucleolytic RNA exosome machinery 95%
- Multiscale regulation of nutrient stress responses in Escherichia coli from chromatin structure to small regulatory RNAs 93%
- Correction of non-random mutational biases along a linear bacterial chromosome by the mismatch repair endonuclease NucS 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.