Back

The T-cell clonal response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease patients is augmented by anti-TNF therapy and often deficient in antibody-responders

Li, D.; Xu, A.; Mengesha, E.; Elyanow, R.; Gittelman, R. M.; Chapman, H.; Prostko, J. C.; Frias, E. C.; Stewart, J. L.; Pozdnyakova, V.; Debbas, P.; Muzukian, A.; Horizon, A. A.; Merin, N.; Joung, S.; Botwin, G. J.; Sobhani, K.; Figueiredo, J. C.; Cheng, S.; Kaplan, I. M.; McGovern, D. P. B.; Merchant, A.; Melmed, G. Y.; Braun, J.

2021-12-08 gastroenterology
10.1101/2021.12.08.21267444 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is a highly effective strategy to protect against infection, which is predominantly mediated by vaccine-induced antibodies. Postvaccination antibodies are robustly produced by those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) even on immune-modifying therapies but are blunted by anti-TNF therapy. In contrast, T-cell response which primarily determines long-term efficacy against disease progression,, is less well understood. We aimed to assess the post-vaccination T-cell response and its relationship to antibody responses in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immune-modifying therapies. MethodsWe evaluated IBD patients who completed SARS-CoV-2 vaccination using samples collected at four time points (dose 1, dose 2, 2 weeks after dose 2, 8 weeks after dose 2). T-cell clonal analysis was performed by T-cell Receptor (TCR) immunosequencing. The breadth (number of unique sequences to a given protein) and depth (relative abundance of all the unique sequences to a given protein) of the T-cell clonal response were quantified using reference datasets and were compared to antibody responses. ResultsOverall, 303 subjects were included (55% female; 5% with prior COVID) (Table). 53% received BNT262b (Pfizer), 42% mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and 5% Ad26CoV2 (J&J). The Spike-specific clonal response peaked 2 weeks after completion of the vaccine regimen (3- and 5-fold for breadth and depth, respectively); no changes were seen for non-Spike clones, suggesting vaccine specificity. Reduced T-cell clonal depth was associated with chronologic age, male sex, and immunomodulator treatment. It was preserved by non-anti-TNF biologic therapies, and augmented clonal depth was associated with anti-TNF treatment. TCR depth and breadth were associated with vaccine type; after adjusting for age and gender, Ad26CoV2 (J&J) exhibited weaker metrics than mRNA-1273 (Moderna) (p=0.01 for each) or BNT262b (Pfizer) (p=0.056 for depth). Antibody and T-cell responses were only modestly correlated. While those with robust humoral responses also had robust TCR clonal expansion, a substantial fraction of patients with high antibody levels had only a minimal T-cell clonal response. ConclusionAge, sex and select immunotherapies are associated with the T-cell clonal response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and T-cell responses are low in many patients despite high antibody levels. These factors, as well as differences seen by vaccine type may help guide reimmunization vaccine strategy in immune-impaired populations. Further study of the effects of anti-TNF therapy on vaccine responses are warranted.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
2
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
3
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
4
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
6
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
11
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
13
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
14
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
18
The Lancet Rheumatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
19
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
21
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
25
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
26
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
27
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
28
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
29
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
30
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%