Back

The T-cell clonal response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease patients is augmented by anti-TNF therapy and often deficient in antibody-responders

Li, D.; Xu, A.; Mengesha, E.; Elyanow, R.; Gittelman, R. M.; Chapman, H.; Prostko, J. C.; Frias, E. C.; Stewart, J. L.; Pozdnyakova, V.; Debbas, P.; Muzukian, A.; Horizon, A. A.; Merin, N.; Joung, S.; Botwin, G. J.; Sobhani, K.; Figueiredo, J. C.; Cheng, S.; Kaplan, I. M.; McGovern, D. P. B.; Merchant, A.; Melmed, G. Y.; Braun, J.

2021-12-08 gastroenterology
10.1101/2021.12.08.21267444 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is a highly effective strategy to protect against infection, which is predominantly mediated by vaccine-induced antibodies. Postvaccination antibodies are robustly produced by those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) even on immune-modifying therapies but are blunted by anti-TNF therapy. In contrast, T-cell response which primarily determines long-term efficacy against disease progression,, is less well understood. We aimed to assess the post-vaccination T-cell response and its relationship to antibody responses in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immune-modifying therapies. MethodsWe evaluated IBD patients who completed SARS-CoV-2 vaccination using samples collected at four time points (dose 1, dose 2, 2 weeks after dose 2, 8 weeks after dose 2). T-cell clonal analysis was performed by T-cell Receptor (TCR) immunosequencing. The breadth (number of unique sequences to a given protein) and depth (relative abundance of all the unique sequences to a given protein) of the T-cell clonal response were quantified using reference datasets and were compared to antibody responses. ResultsOverall, 303 subjects were included (55% female; 5% with prior COVID) (Table). 53% received BNT262b (Pfizer), 42% mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and 5% Ad26CoV2 (J&J). The Spike-specific clonal response peaked 2 weeks after completion of the vaccine regimen (3- and 5-fold for breadth and depth, respectively); no changes were seen for non-Spike clones, suggesting vaccine specificity. Reduced T-cell clonal depth was associated with chronologic age, male sex, and immunomodulator treatment. It was preserved by non-anti-TNF biologic therapies, and augmented clonal depth was associated with anti-TNF treatment. TCR depth and breadth were associated with vaccine type; after adjusting for age and gender, Ad26CoV2 (J&J) exhibited weaker metrics than mRNA-1273 (Moderna) (p=0.01 for each) or BNT262b (Pfizer) (p=0.056 for depth). Antibody and T-cell responses were only modestly correlated. While those with robust humoral responses also had robust TCR clonal expansion, a substantial fraction of patients with high antibody levels had only a minimal T-cell clonal response. ConclusionAge, sex and select immunotherapies are associated with the T-cell clonal response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and T-cell responses are low in many patients despite high antibody levels. These factors, as well as differences seen by vaccine type may help guide reimmunization vaccine strategy in immune-impaired populations. Further study of the effects of anti-TNF therapy on vaccine responses are warranted.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
3
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.5%
4
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
6
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
7
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
8
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
9
npj Vaccines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
11
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Med
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
15
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
18
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
21
Gastroenterology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
22
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Vaccine
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Science Immunology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%