Early detection of sublexical and lexical processing in beginning readers: evidence from Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEPs)
Wang, F.; Nguyen, Q. T. H.; Kaneshiro, B.; Hasak, L.; Wang, A. M.; Toomarian, E. Y.; Norcia, A. M.; McCandliss, B.
Show abstract
There are multiple levels of processing relevant to reading that vary in their visual, sublexical and lexical orthographic processing demands. Segregating distinct cortical sources for each of these levels has been challenging in EEG studies of early readers. To address this challenge, we applied recent advances in analyzing high-density EEG using Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEPs) via data-driven Reliable Components Analysis (RCA) in a group of early readers spanning from kindergarten to second grade. Three controlled stimulus contrasts--familiar words versus unfamiliar pseudofonts, familiar words versus orthographically legal pseudowords, and orthographically legal pseudowords versus orthographically illegal nonwords--were used to isolate visual print/letter selectivity, sublexical processing, and lexical processing, respectively. We found robust responses specific to each of these processing levels, even in kindergarteners who have limited knowledge of print. Moreover, comparing amplitudes of these three stimulus contrasts across three reading fluency-based groups and three grade-based groups revealed fluency group and grade group main effects only for lexical contrast (i.e., words versus orthographically legal pseudowords). Furthermore, we found that sublexical orthography-related responses shifted their topographic distribution from the right to left hemisphere from kindergarten to first and second grades. Results suggest that, with more sensitive measures, the sublexical and lexical fine tuning for words--as a bio-marker of reading ability--can be detected at a much earlier stage than previously assumed. Declarations of interestNone
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reading-related brain changes in audiovisual processing: cross-sectional and longitudinal MEG evidence 97%
- Alpha Traveling Waves during Working Memory: Disentangling Bottom-up Gating and Top-down Gain Control 96%
- Controlled retrieval relies on directed interactions between semantic control regions and visual cortex: MEG evidence from oscillatory dynamics 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pre- and post-target cortical processes predict speech-in-noise performance 97%
- Language beyond the language system: dorsal visuospatial pathways support processing of demonstratives and spatial language during naturalistic fast fMRI 96%
- Differential effects of prediction error and adaptation along the auditory cortical hierarchy during deviance processing 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Linguistic and attentional factors -not statistical regularities- contribute to word-selective neural responses with FPVS-oddball paradigms 97%
- Lateralization of orthographic processing in fixed-gaze and natural reading conditions 97%
- Attentional Modulations of Alpha Power Are Sensitive to the Task-relevance of Auditory Spatial Information 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intelligence and Visual Mismatch Negativity: Is Pre-Attentive Visual Discrimination Related to General Cognitive Ability? 97%
- The Electrophysiological Markers of Statistically Learned Attentional Enhancement: Evidence for a Saliency Based Mechanism 96%
- Lexical influences on categorical speech perception are driven by a temporoparietal circuit 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.